Contractors Should Disclose Work Carried out in China
10/3/2022
iStock illustration
The Protection Division on Aug. 25 printed — with instant impact — two new Protection Federal Acquisition Regulation Complement clauses requiring prime contractors and subcontractors to reveal any work carried out in China on sure division contracts.
Beneath the interim rule, the division is prohibited from awarding or extending sure new contracts if a contractor fails to reveal its use of Chinese language labor on a lined contract. Though there isn’t any prohibition on the division awarding a lined contract to an entity that makes a disclosure, the division can depend on a wide range of authorities to exclude sure contractors and merchandise that signify provide chain dangers, particularly if the services or products contain info expertise.
These new guidelines implement part 855 of the 2022 Nationwide Protection Authorization Act, which directed the division to require two-phase disclosures from sure contractors: an preliminary disclosure when a contractor submits a proposal for a lined contract and an annual disclosure for fiscal years 2023 and 2024 from any contractor that holds a lined contract. The division applied this provision with two new corresponding clauses, a solicitation clause (DFARS 252.225-7057) and a contract clause (DFARS 252.225-7058).
The disclosure necessities apply to “lined contracts,” which embody any Protection Division prime contract or subcontract with an anticipated worth greater than $5 million — aside from contracts for industrial services or products. And the disclosure necessities apply to “lined entities,” or contractors performing work on a lined contract within the Individuals’s Republic of China.
The pre-award disclosure requires that lined entities establish proposed use of Chinese language labor on the time of proposal submission. The offeror additionally should establish the variety of people who will carry out work in China and supply an outline of the bodily presence — together with road addresses — in China the place work will probably be carried out. This disclosure additionally contains any subcontract that meets the lined contract definition.
Primes and higher-tier contractors will doubtless want to guage whether or not to require disclosures from potential subcontractors to help their proposals.
These new guidelines increase questions of how the Protection Division plans to implement these necessities.
What does it imply to be “performing work” in China on a lined contract? The definition of “lined contractors” notes that performing work in China can embody leasing or proudly owning actual property in China that’s used within the efficiency of a lined contract, however neither the brand new DFARS clauses nor the NDAA seems to supply another steering on what it means to “carry out work.”
The pre-award disclosures should embody the “proposed use of workforce on a lined prime contract or subcontract, if the offeror employs a number of people who carry out work within the Individuals’s Republic of China.”
Taken actually, this might require description of the whole proposed use of workforce on the contract — not simply in China — and could be triggered even when the offeror employs people performing work in China that’s unconnected to the related contract. We don’t suppose that is what the division supposed and counsel this as one other level for clarification within the ultimate rule.
The post-award disclosures are required in fiscal years 2023 and 2024. The clauses don’t present steering on when in the course of the fiscal years the disclosures ought to be made, in what format or to whom.
As these new clauses begin to seem in solicitations and contracts, protection contractors ought to consider how the disclosures could work together with different current division initiatives.
Contractors ought to be certain that any disclosures underneath this interim rule are according to the representations they’re making associated to lined telecommunications gear and providers underneath Part 889 of the 2019 NDAA. To the extent that workers of a contractor that’s in privity with the federal government are utilizing telecommunications gear or providers in China — whether or not for a division contract or another motive — this disclosure may implicate Part 889 considerations.
The total extent of what the Protection Division plans to do with the knowledge it receives from these new clauses is unsure. If info expertise is being offered to the federal government, there are authorities that might allow the federal government to exclude contractors from procurements and even to take away merchandise from the federal government’s present provide chains. Contractors want to grasp how these new disclosure obligations match inside the authorities’s general China technique when establishing their compliance applications and when contemplating the place to increase their manufacturing and software program improvement actions.
A failure to supply the required disclosures may doubtlessly open contractors as much as False Claims Act legal responsibility underneath an implied certification or fraud within the inducement concept of legal responsibility.
The issuance of an interim rule efficient instantly is according to different Protection Division actions regarding China and provide chain considerations. The division is accepting public feedback on the interim rule by way of Oct. 24, and questions raised by way of the general public remark course of could lead the division to additional make clear the rule.
As talked about, the underlying necessities stem from final 12 months’s NDAA. The supply is considerably uncommon in that it doesn’t prohibit the division from coming into into contracts with distributors utilizing China-based labor however does prohibit the division from coming into into contracts with them until they disclose the usage of China-based workforce. It then requires the secretary of protection to supply congressional protection committees with semi-annual briefings beginning subsequent January summarizing the related disclosures.
Along with counting on present exclusion authorities, it’s definitely doable that the disclosure requirement — and related congressional briefings — may result in an outright prohibition.
Susan Cassidy and Scott Freling are companions and Carl Wiersum is an affiliate within the authorities contracts apply of Covington and Burling LLP.
Matters: Protection Contracting