Montreal, Canada – An impartial panel will start hearings this week into Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s use of an emergency measure to disperse anti-vaccine protesters who had blocked Canada-US border crossings and occupied downtown Ottawa earlier this 12 months.
The Public Order Emergency Fee, headed by former Ontario Court docket of Enchantment Justice Paul Rouleau, will maintain its first public listening to on Thursday within the capital.
The fee will look into the circumstances that led Trudeau to invoke the Emergencies Act in February in response to the “Freedom Convoy” demonstrations, organised by far-right activists.
“This important section will make clear the occasions that led to the declaration of the general public order emergency and totally discover the explanations superior for the declaration,” Rouleau mentioned in an announcement on Tuesday.
The panel mentioned it is going to hear testimony from 65 witnesses, together with convoy members, Ottawa residents, regulation enforcement officers, municipal and provincial officers, and federal authorities ministers. Trudeau can also be anticipated to reply questions through the six weeks of public hearings.
The choice to invoke the Emergencies Act for the primary time because it got here into drive in 1988 drew concern from civil rights teams and different observers who questioned whether or not Canada had met the strict authorized threshold wanted to invoke the measure.
Others have requested whether or not it was needed to make use of the act in any respect or if authorities lacked the desire to make use of the instruments already at their disposal to finish the protests.
The transfer gave the federal government sweeping powers, together with the flexibility to bar any public meeting “which will fairly be anticipated to result in a breach of the peace” and limit entry to particular areas.
The Emergencies Act additionally mandated the general public inquiry starting this week.
That requirement was born out of criticism of the measure’s predecessor, the Battle Measures Act. It was invoked in 1970 in response to a wave of violence by hardline Quebec separatists and was broadly criticised as an infringement on civil liberties.
The convoy
The “Freedom Convoy” members converged on downtown Ottawa in late January to protest a vaccine mandate for truckers crossing the Canada-US border. The anti-vaccine truckers and their supporters additionally referred to as for an finish to all COVID-19 restrictions and for Trudeau to step down.
Individuals occupied the streets of downtown Ottawa for a number of weeks, blaring their horns and disrupting day by day life whereas others erected blockades at border crossings within the provinces of Ontario and Alberta.
Days after Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act on February 14, federal and provincial regulation enforcement companies moved in to finish the blockades and the Ottawa occupation. They arrested dozens of members.
The prime minister later defended his determination, saying it was “the accountable factor to do”.
“After weeks of harmful and illegal actions, … it grew to become clear that native and provincial authorities wanted extra instruments to revive order and preserve individuals protected,” Trudeau mentioned.
Cara Zwibel, director of the elemental freedoms programme on the Canadian Civil Liberties Affiliation, mentioned the group believed from the very starting that Canada’s use of the Emergencies Act was unjustified.
“We have now actual questions on why regular, pre-existing authorized avenues weren’t used to deal with issues as an alternative of invoking the Emergencies Act,” Zwibel advised Al Jazeera in an interview this week forward of the fee’s first listening to.
Accountability, solutions
Rouleau, the lead commissioner, granted full standing through the public hearings to twenty entities, together with the federal authorities, three provinces, two cities, 5 police officers and teams, and a gaggle of convoy organisers.
“Full standing means they are going to be given advance discover on info submitted into proof earlier than the inquiry in addition to sure privileges, resembling the chance to counsel or cross-examine witnesses,” The Canadian Press information company reported.
Based on Zwibel, the fee hearings are essential for accountability functions and can push the federal government to clarify why sure restrictions have been put in place beneath the Emergencies Act, together with a freeze on the property of convoy organisers.
“I feel that is one thing that the fee of inquiry will get into in additional element,” she mentioned.
“It actually wasn’t clear to individuals how that order would apply, how it will be applied, together with frankly the establishments like banks and credit score unions that have been charged with really implementing it,” she mentioned.
Zwibel added that she expects the federal government to attempt to protect some info from the general public hearings by claiming privilege “on the idea of nationwide safety and on the idea of cupboard deliberations or cupboard confidences”.
“And in order that’s one of many issues that I feel we’re going to be taking a look at very carefully is to attempt to see actually how clear is the federal government being and the way clear frankly does this inquiry course of require them to be,” she advised Al Jazeera.
In late June, the fee introduced that the federal government would launch cupboard paperwork to the panel after agreeing to not declare privilege. It’s unclear if these paperwork might be made public.
The fee has till February 6, 2023, to submit a remaining report back to the Canadian authorities, together with any suggestions.
In the meantime, a separate parliamentary inquiry is being held into the “Freedom Convoy” and the authorities’ response, as is a community-led initiative generally known as the Ottawa Folks’s Fee on the Convoy Occupation.