CMS is reevaluating hospitals’ purposes for exceptions from reimbursement cuts to their off-campus outpatient services following pushback from the trade.
In January, CMS rejected greater than 60% of the mid-build exceptions, which is designed to protect increased funds if hospitals doc that their off-campus outpatient departments had been underneath development when the Bipartisan Price range Act handed in 2015.
With out the exception, reimbursement charges drop to 40% of the total outpatient potential funds system charge. Hospitals would even be responsible for overpayments issued beginning Jan. 1, 2018, in the event that they billed by way of OPPS.
Suppliers that had been denied are now not required to report or return overpayments, CMS mentioned earlier this month. They need to submit further documentation that helps their instances by Oct. 10.
Obtain Trendy Healthcare’s app to remain knowledgeable when trade information breaks.
“It is an vital outcome for these hospitals that thought the denials had been unjustified. Hospitals have been lobbying very exhausting since January for some sort of aid. CMS employed a brand new auditing agency to mainly begin over,” mentioned Christopher Kenny, a companion at King & Spalding. CMS denied many purposes as a result of the development agreements had been with landlords, not development corporations, he mentioned. “It appears the company will take a broader view of what is likely to be a permissible contract that might conceivably qualify in an settlement for precise development.”
Hospitals are petitioning for grandfathered outpatient departments amid a authorized battle over site-neutral fee coverage, through which they search to equalize funds for analysis and administration providers whether or not they’re delivered at hospital-owned outpatient departments or unbiased doctor clinics.
A panel of appellate judges dominated final 12 months that HHS’ site-neutral fee coverage for 2019 might go ahead, overturning a decrease court docket determination. The Supreme Courtroom upheld site-neutral pay cuts in June. Hospitals have additionally sued to cease related site-neutral fee insurance policies from going ahead underneath the 2020 hospital OPPS regulation.
CMS estimates it was paying $75 to $85 per service in hospital outpatient settings than at physicians’ places of work, even the bodily places and affected person acuities had been the identical. Sufferers footed about 20% of the associated fee.
Hospitals have argued that they want increased reimbursement charges by way of facility charges to offset the comparatively increased prices of extra rigorous survey necessities, extra stringent well being and security guidelines, staffing prices and different elements. The upper funds made underneath the OPPS create monetary incentives for suppliers to transform physicians’ places of work into hospital outpatient departments. CMS mentioned.
Policymakers more and more acknowledge that the fee disparity is unjustified, Paul Ginsburg, director of the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Well being Coverage, wrote in an e-mail.
“This grandfathering provision exempting off-campus services constructed previous to the 2015 laws has already served its goal of offering a transition to the positioning impartial coverage and may now be ended, however that’s one thing that the Congress must do,” Ginsburg wrote.
CMS is predicted to extend the variety of off-campus provider-based departments that may be eligible for increased reimbursement as necessities calm down, which might enhance Medicare spending, mentioned Tim Epple, managing director at Avalere Well being.
“That is a direct and near-term optimistic for hospitals with current or in-progress off-campus provider-based departments, although in the long run ought to have considerably restricted influence in of hospital enlargement and [hospital outpatient department] technique,” Epple wrote in an e-mail.
The preliminary denials seemingly might be overturned, mentioned John Jacob, a companion at Akin Gump
“Hospitals had been going through the untenable place of returning hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in purported Medicare overpayments that they honestly believed had been correct funds for the outpatient care offered to their sufferers,” Jacob wrote in an e-mail.
The accounting agency Myers and Stauffer might be taking on auditing duties from Cahaba Administration and Consulting. Myers and Stauffer is predicted to have a looser interpretation of what constitutes a broader development contract.
Though CMS instructed suppliers to not resend information they beforehand submitted, hospitals ought to nonetheless overview their authentic documentation, mentioned Regan Tankersley, an legal professional at Corridor Render.
“If suppliers determine doable errors or inconsistencies within the audit course of from the unique denial, I feel submitting info to appropriate these potential errors is a good suggestion even when meaning together with beforehand submitted documentation,” Tankersley wrote in an e-mail.