On this week’s feedback replace, readers are baffled by Adidas and Parley for the Oceans’ determination to drift a recycled-plastic tennis court docket inside the Nice Barrier Reef and discussing different prime tales.
Adidas and environmental organisation Parley for the Oceans have collaborated to create a floating tennis court docket in a bid to advertise Adidas’ newest vary of attire, which includes recycled plastic.
Launched to coincide with the Australian Open tennis match that’s at the moment happening in Melbourne, the colorful vary of clothes is the most recent collaboration between the model and Parley for the Oceans.
“Ridiculous publicity stunt”
Readers aren’t bought. “Ridiculous publicity stunt,” mentioned Apsco Radiales.
“It will assist with the devastating lack of tennis balls within the ocean,” joked Jam.
Items agreed: “Nothing says environmental stewardship like putting in a chunk of floating plastic in an already fragile ecosystem.”
“Recycle plastic however litter the ocean with tennis balls,” concluded Reefs.
Are commenters lacking the purpose? Be part of the dialogue ›
Commenter claims “there isn’t any housing scarcity for millionaires and billionaires”
Rutgers professor Jason Barr’s proposal so as to add 1,760-acres of reclaimed land to the tip of Manhattan in a bid to create extra housing and fight local weather change has brought about controversy amongst readers.
“It is a radical concept however I prefer it,” mentioned Steven H. “Flood safety and area for extra housing is a win-win.”
John Doe disagreed: “You are apprehensive about rising sea ranges and elevated flooding however placing 250,000 houses on at sea degree landfill is a good suggestion? That is peak silly.”
“There isn’t any housing scarcity for millionaires and billionaires,” added Zea Newland. “We want extra housing for lower-income of us who hold the town working, however given how this plan would produce prime waterfront actual property and given how massive of an funding is required to create the land within the first place, I do not see any potential for significant change with reference of housing.”
Is extending Manhattan a good suggestion? Be part of the dialogue ›
Reader calls extra-wide oak staircase “a daft design”
Paolo Cossu Architects has sparked debate by including an extra-wide oak staircase, which doubles as a chunk of furnishings, to a Victorian terrace in east London.
“No stair nosing, no handrail, and the riser to tread ratio appears to be like harmful, ” mentioned Walter Astor. “It is easy to make a stair look novel and attention-grabbing whenever you refuse to adjust to security necessities mandated by the native constructing rules.”
“It’s in reality harmful,” replied Chris Hargreaves. “What a daft design.”
Sim disagreed: “Or an architect has thought cleverly, in full information of the info (together with their knowledgeable consumer) on find out how to fulfill constructing management. Maybe, as an example, there’s a balustrade element that may be eliminated – on the consumer’s alternative – when desired.”
What do you consider the Farleigh Highway challenge? Be part of the dialogue ›
Commenter says the metaverse is “an actual property frontier”
Readers are discussing a digital residence by digital artist Andrés Reisinger and architect Alba de la Fuente. The 2-storey home is designed as a hideaway in a snowy forest and was impressed by the clear geometry of Dieter Rams’ industrial designs.
“This isn’t dangerous for a metaverse construct,” mentioned Archibro, “which, by the best way, is a brand new actual property frontier. Traders are already snapping up digital properties.”
Livid B disagreed: “Already sick of the metaverse. It is actually simply Second Life 2.0., and initiatives like this carry no extra advantage or want for publication than every other theoretical challenge. I might quite see pupil initiatives that push boundaries than a fairly commonplace modernist home in a area.”
“Free of the real-world constraints of gravity and capitalism, designers of the so-called ‘metaverse’ insist on conforming to the real-world constraints of gravity and capitalism by mindlessly reproducing modernist designs,” concluded James G. “An ideology that arose over 100 years in the past.”
What do you consider the metaverse? Be part of the dialogue ›
Feedback replace
Dezeen is the world’s most commented structure and design journal, receiving 1000’s of feedback every month from readers. Maintain updated on the most recent discussions on our feedback web page.