BY KIM BELLARD
All of us – nicely, most of us – attempt to be agreeable. It’s often a greater social lubricant to say “sure” than “no.” It’s broadly thought of to be higher to your profession to be the one who all the time says “sure” as an alternative of being the troublesome employee who typically says “no.” “Sure, expensive” is a safer marital technique than “no” or “not once more.” However, like most typical wisdoms, these should be challenged.
I’ve learn a number of articles not too long ago the place “no” is the recommended technique, and I believe there’s one thing there. Particularly for healthcare.
————–
The primary is a enjoyable, fascinating, probably far-reaching article in Nature, “Why 4 scientists spent a 12 months saying no.” The authors are “a bunch of mid-career environmental social scientists” who felt they have been saying “sure” to too many commitments. Because of this, they determined to not solely be extra deliberate about saying no but additionally to trace it. Their purpose was to collectively decline 100 work-related requests, which they hit in March 2022.
It’s more durable than you may suppose; because the authors warn: “It entails rethinking priorities and empowering ourselves and our colleagues to set boundaries.” They needed to overlook FOMO (concern of lacking out) and embrace JOMO (pleasure of lacking out), with a view to create extra room for intentional “sure.”
They provide 4 insights concerning the realized talent of claiming “no”:
- Monitoring helped make “no” an choice;
- Say no extra typically advert to bigger asks;
- Saying no is emotional work;
- Follow makes “no” simpler.
It’s typically so tempting to simply say “sure,” however we’ve all solely received a lot time and power. Generally “no” is the most effective reply.
————-
Generally, although, the saying “no” is just not out loud; typically we are saying no by our actions. Which leads me to a brand new development: “quiet quitting.”
That is one other TikTok development, began by one person (@zkchillin) in July and rapidly going viral. The mainstream press is throughout it, with articles in WSJ, NYT, NPR, and CNN, amongst others. Regardless of what it seems like, quiet quitting isn’t ghosting your employer, simply strolling away out of your job with out resignation or different declaration of leaving. In reality, it doesn’t contain quitting in any respect.
Quiet quitting rejects the notion that staff are presupposed to all the time attempt to go above and past. It rejects the notion that work life is extra vital than life exterior work. It encourages individuals to say “no’ extra at work inside mechanically saying “sure” to requests that they tackle extra duties or longer hours. It doesn’t imply doing the naked minimal required to maintain your job, however it insists on solely doing the issues the job requires and pays them to do, in the course of the hours they’re presupposed to be doing them.
It’s a Gen Z factor. One 24-year-old TikToker, Zaid Khan, mentioned: “You’re quitting the concept of going above and past. You’re not subscribing to the hustle-culture mentality that work must be your life.”
Healthcare, after all, shudders on the considered quiet quitting. What would occur if nurses wouldn’t work all these further shifts? What would have occurred if docs and different medical professionals had refused to see COVID-19 sufferers when PPE was missing and nobody fairly knew how harmful COVID was or learn how to deal with it? What would occur if main care docs stopped making an attempt to suit 26 hours of labor right into a “regular” workday? What would occur if physicians mentioned it’s ridiculous that they must spend two hours a day exterior work hours on EHR duties?
Healthcare as we all know it could collapse…as perhaps it ought to.
————-
Final however not least, typically healthcare professionals needs to be saying “no” loud and clear, as recommended in a NEJM Perspective by Matthew Okay. Wynia, M.D., M.P.H.:Skilled Civil Disobedience — Medical-Society Tasks after Dobbs
The core query, Dr. Wynia, posits, is: “What ought to medical professionals do when a regulation requires them to hurt a affected person?” He’s referring, after all, to restrictions on medical observe imposed by numerous state abortion legal guidelines within the wake of the Dobbs determination. He then asks the corollary query: “When these legal guidelines immediately and instantly threaten the well being of sufferers, ought to physicians collectively disobey them — that’s, ought to they have interaction in skilled civil disobedience?”
Healthcare has loads of organizations that collectively declare to advocate for its constituents – the AMA, numerous specialty organizations, the American Nurses Affiliation, and so forth. Cynically, these are sometimes used to argue to larger pay and/or higher working situations, quite than for the most effective pursuits of sufferers. Generally they do take ethical stances, together with (as Dr. Wynia factors out) their issues concerning the implications of Dobbs. However truly taking motion, of threating work stoppages or boycotts? That’s a step they not often take, and one Dr. Wynia believes it’s time for.
“Too typically,” he laments, “organized medication has failed to satisfy its obligation to guard sufferers when doing so required appearing towards state authority.” Dr. Wynia wonders: “How lengthy may a harmful state regulation survive if the medical career, as a complete, refused to be intimidated into harming sufferers, even when such a refusal meant that many physicians may go to jail?”
Not lengthy, I’d guess.
The hazard, he warns, is that: “…when a society takes a mistaken flip and medical professionals go alongside, distrust in medication grows and both social change should be pushed by different teams or the society fails.” In different phrases, time for the medical career to say no, a minimum of in the case of any restrictions that impression the most effective care of their sufferers.
——————
Usually, I’m somebody who’s intrigued by new concepts, who is worked up about innovation, who needs to see change – all issues that sign saying “sure.” However saying “sure” to too many issues typically successfully means implicitly saying no to most of them; we will solely achieve this a lot directly, we will solely settle for a lot change at a time. Saying “no” extra typically, and extra strategically, permits us to give attention to the issues we should say “sure” to.
In healthcare, sufferers are too typically pressured to just accept “sure” to issues they’d actually prefer to say “no”
to. Physicians and different healthcare professionals are sometimes pressured to comply with work practices and restrictions that they know they need to say “no” to. And each sufferers and healthcare professionals are discovering that legislators are appearing in methods which might be at odds with our greatest pursuits.
Time to say “no.”
Kim is a former emarketing exec at a significant Blues plan, editor of the late & lamented Tincture.io, and now common THCB contributor.