On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Courtroom will hear Donald Trump’s arguments that he’s immune from prosecution for his efforts to steal the 2020 presidential election. It’s probably that every one — or almost all — of the justices agree {that a} former president who tried to grab energy and stay in workplace illegally might be prosecuted. I think that some justices might also want to make clear whether or not doctrines of presidential immunity may apply in different contexts — for instance, to a president’s actions as commander in chief throughout a time of struggle. However the justices must also acknowledge the profoundly unfavorable impression they might have if the courtroom doesn’t resolve these points rapidly and decisively.
If delay prevents this Trump case from being tried this yr, the general public might by no means hear crucial and historic proof developed earlier than the grand jury, and our system might by no means maintain the person most chargeable for Jan. 6 to account.
The Jan. 6 Home choose committee’s hearings and last report in 2022 relied on testimony given by dozens of Republicans — together with many who labored intently with Mr. Trump within the White Home, in his Justice Division and on his 2020 presidential marketing campaign. Particular counsel Jack Smith’s election-related indictment of Mr. Trump depends on most of the similar firsthand witnesses. Though the particular counsel reached various the identical conclusions because the choose committee, the indictment relies on a separate and impartial investigation. Proof was developed and offered to a grand jury sitting in Washington, D.C.
The indictment and public reporting recommend that the particular counsel was in a position to acquire key proof our committee didn’t have. For instance, it seems that the grand jury acquired proof from witnesses similar to Mark Meadows, the previous Trump chief of workers, and Dan Scavino, a former Trump aide, each of whom refused to testify in our investigation. Public reporting additionally means that members of Mr. Trump’s Workplace of White Home Counsel and different White Home aides testified in full, with none limitations primarily based on govt privilege, as did Vice President Mike Pence and his counsel.
The particular counsel’s indictment lays out Mr. Trump’s detailed plan to overturn the 2020 election, together with the corrupt use of fraudulent slates of electors in a number of states. In response to the indictment, senior advisers within the White Home, Justice Division and elsewhere repeatedly warned that Mr. Trump’s claims of election fraud have been false and that his plans for Jan. 6 have been unlawful. Mr. Trump selected to disregard these warnings. (Bear in mind what the White Home lawyer Eric Herschmann informed Mr. Trump’s alleged co-conspirator John Eastman on Jan. 7, 2021: “Get an awesome f’ing felony protection lawyer. You’re gonna want it.”) There’s little doubt that Mr. Trump’s closest advisers additionally gave the federal grand jury minute-to-minute accounts of his malicious conduct on Jan. 6, describing how they repeatedly begged the president to instruct the violent rioters to go away our Capitol and the way Mr. Trump refused for a number of hours to take action as he watched the assault on tv. This historic testimony a couple of former president’s conduct is more likely to stay secret till the particular counsel presents his case at trial.
As a felony defendant, Mr. Trump has lengthy had entry to federal grand jury materials regarding his Jan. 6 indictment and to all of the testimony obtained by our choose committee. He is aware of what all these witnesses have mentioned underneath oath and understands the dangers he faces at trial. That’s why he’s doing every part attainable to attempt to delay his Jan. 6 federal felony trial till after the November election. If the trial is delayed previous this fall and Mr. Trump wins re-election, he will certainly hearth the particular counsel, order his Justice Division to drop all Jan. 6 instances and attempt to forestall key grand jury testimony from ever seeing the sunshine of day.
I understand how Mr. Trump’s delay techniques work. Our committee needed to spend months litigating his privilege claims (in Trump v. Thompson) earlier than we may achieve entry to White Home information. Courtroom information and public reporting recommend that the particular counsel additionally invested appreciable time defeating Mr. Trump’s claims of govt privilege, which have been aimed toward stopping key proof from reaching the grand jury. All of this proof ought to be offered in open courtroom, in order that the general public can totally assess what Mr. Trump did on Jan. 6 and what a person able to that sort of depravity may do if once more handed the superior energy of the presidency.
Early this yr, a federal appeals courtroom took lower than a month after oral argument to challenge its prolonged opinion on immunity. Historical past reveals that the Supreme Courtroom can act simply as rapidly, when crucial. And the courtroom ought to vogue its choice in a manner that doesn’t result in additional time-consuming appeals on presidential immunity. It can’t be {that a} president of the USA can try to steal an election and seize energy however our justice system is incapable of bringing him to trial earlier than the subsequent election 4 years later.
Mr. Trump believes he can threaten and intimidate judges and their households, assert baseless authorized defenses and thereby keep away from accountability altogether. Via this conduct, he seeks to interrupt our establishments. If Mr. Trump’s techniques forestall his Jan. 6 trial from continuing within the strange course, he may even have succeeded in concealing crucial proof from the American folks — proof demonstrating his disregard for the rule of regulation, his cruelty on Jan. 6 and the deep flaws in character that make him unfit to function president. The Supreme Courtroom ought to perceive this actuality and conclude directly that no immunity applies right here.
Liz Cheney, a Republican, is a former U.S. consultant from Wyoming and was vice chairwoman of the Jan. 6 choose committee within the Home of Representatives.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a variety of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed here are some ideas. And right here’s our e-mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Comply with the New York Occasions Opinion part on Fb, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.