The invoice is supposed to delve into the basis reason behind the crush, and have a look at how authorities dealt with the catastrophe and who must be blamed for it. It envisages the creation of a fact-finding committee with 9 members that might independently look at the catastrophe for as much as 15 months.
As soon as the committee determines who’s accountable and who ought to face expenses, it could report them to the federal government’s investigation businesses. The businesses would then be required to conclude investigations of the suspects inside three months, based on the invoice.
The crush, one of many greatest peacetime disasters in South Korea, triggered a nationwide outpouring of grief. The victims, who had been largely of their 20s and 30s, had gathered in Seoul’s standard nightlife district of Itaewon for Halloween celebrations.
Within the aftermath of the tragedy, there was additionally anger that the federal government had once more ignored security and regulatory points regardless of the teachings discovered for the reason that 2014 sinking of the ferry Sewol, which killed 304 individuals – largely youngsters on a college journey.
In early 2023, a police particular investigation concluded that police and municipal officers did not formulate efficient crowd management steps, regardless of accurately anticipating an enormous variety of individuals in Itaewon.
On the time, investigators mentioned police had additionally ignored hotline calls by pedestrians who warned of swelling crowds earlier than the surge turned lethal.
Greater than 20 police and different officers have been on trial over the catastrophe however few top-level officers have been charged or held accountable, prompting bereaved households and opposition lawmakers to name for an impartial probe.
Forward of the vote, Kim Kyo-heung from the primary liberal opposition Democratic Celebration and chairman of parliament’s security committee expressed hope the probe would decide accountability for the catastrophe and structural issues behind the crush, in addition to formulate steps to stop comparable disasters.
Households of the victims welcomed the invoice whereas rallying outdoors the Nationwide Meeting.
“I feel as we speak is certainly probably the most memorable day for our bereaved households,” mentioned Lee Jeong-min, a consultant for the households. “It wasn’t attainable with out the assist of opposition lawmakers and many voters who’ve sympathised with us. I would prefer to say we actually thank them.”
President Yoon had beforehand opposed a brand new investigation of the catastrophe. In January, he vetoed an analogous invoice for an impartial investigation of the Itaewon crush that had handed via parliament.
Nevertheless, throughout a gathering with Democratic Celebration chief Lee Jae-myung Monday, he mentioned he would not oppose it, ought to some present disputes be resolved, similar to whether or not the fact-finding committee can request arrest warrants.
A shift in Yoon’s place got here as he faces rising public calls to cooperate with Lee’s occasion, which scored a large win within the April 10 parliamentary election, extending its management of parliament for one more 4 years.
In a gathering with Yoon’s ruling Folks Energy Celebration on Wednesday, Lee’s occasion agreed to take away contentious clauses from the draft invoice.
The Democratic Celebration’s chief policymaker, Jin Sung-joon, mentioned the occasion had accepted calls for by the president and his ruling occasion within the curiosity of the “bereaved households, who mentioned they can not wait any longer”.
function loadGtagEvents(isGoogleCampaignActive) { if (!isGoogleCampaignActive) { return; } var id = document.getElementById('toi-plus-google-campaign'); if (id) { return; } (function(f, b, e, v, n, t, s) { t = b.createElement(e); t.async = !0; t.defer = !0; t.src = v; t.id = 'toi-plus-google-campaign'; s = b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s); })(f, b, e, 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-877820074', n, t, s); };
function loadSurvicateJs(allowedSurvicateSections = []){ const section = window.location.pathname.split('/')[1] const isHomePageAllowed = window.location.pathname === '/' && allowedSurvicateSections.includes('homepage')
if(allowedSurvicateSections.includes(section) || isHomePageAllowed){ (function(w) { var s = document.createElement('script'); s.src="https://survey.survicate.com/workspaces/0be6ae9845d14a7c8ff08a7a00bd9b21/web_surveys.js"; s.async = true; var e = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; e.parentNode.insertBefore(s, e); })(window); }
}
window.TimesApps = window.TimesApps || {};
var TimesApps = window.TimesApps;
TimesApps.toiPlusEvents = function(config) {
var isConfigAvailable = "toiplus_site_settings" in f && "isFBCampaignActive" in f.toiplus_site_settings && "isGoogleCampaignActive" in f.toiplus_site_settings;
var isPrimeUser = window.isPrime;
if (isConfigAvailable && !isPrimeUser) {
loadGtagEvents(f.toiplus_site_settings.isGoogleCampaignActive);
loadFBEvents(f.toiplus_site_settings.isFBCampaignActive);
loadSurvicateJs(f.toiplus_site_settings.allowedSurvicateSections);
} else {
var JarvisUrl="https://vsp1jarvispvt.indiatimes.com/v1/feeds/toi_plus/site_settings/643526e21443833f0c454615?db_env=published";
window.getFromClient(JarvisUrl, function(config){
if (config) {
loadGtagEvents(config?.isGoogleCampaignActive);
loadFBEvents(config?.isFBCampaignActive);
loadSurvicateJs(config?.allowedSurvicateSections);
}
})
}
};
})(
window,
document,
'script',
);
Source link