MARK MEADOWS, White Home chief of employees: So, Mr. President, if I, if I would have the ability to leap in, and I’ll give Brad an opportunity. Mr. Secretary, one, clearly, there’s, there are allegations the place we consider that not each vote or truthful vote and authorized vote was, was counted. And that’s at odds with the illustration from the secretary of state’s workplace. What I’m looking forward to is there are a way that we are able to, we are able to discover some type of settlement to, to, to have a look at this slightly bit extra absolutely. As , the president talked about Fulton County, however in a few of these areas the place there appears to be a distinction of the place the info appear to steer. And so, Mr. Secretary, I used to be hopeful that, , in a spirit of cooperation and compromise, is there, there’s one thing that we are able to not less than have a dialogue to have a look at a few of these allegations to discover a path ahead that’s much less litigious.
RAFFENSPERGER: Properly, I’ve listened to what the president has simply mentioned. President Trump, we’ve had a number of lawsuits, and we’ve needed to reply in courtroom to the lawsuits and the contentions of — we don’t agree that you’ve one. We don’t, I didn’t agree in regards to the 200,000 quantity that you simply talked about. And I’m going by way of that time by level. What we had accomplished is we gave our State Senate about one and a half hours of, of our time going by way of the election concern by concern. After which on the State Home, the Authorities Affairs Committee, we gave them about two and a half hours of our time, going again level by level on all the problems of rivalry. After which just some days in the past, we met with our U.S. congressmen, Republican congressmen, and we gave them about two hours of our time speaking about this previous election. Going again primarily what you’re, what you’ve talked about right here, targeted in on primarily, I consider it’s the absentee poll course of, I don’t consider that you simply’re actually questioning the Dominion machines as a result of we did a hand re-tally, a 1 % re-tally of all of the ballots and in contrast that to what the machine mentioned. And it got here up with nearly the identical end result. Then we did the recount. We’ve received nearly the identical end result. So I, I assume we might in all probability take that off the desk. I don’t suppose there’s a difficulty about that. I believe what you had been —
TRUMP: Properly, Brad, Brad, not that there’s not a difficulty, however as a result of we now have an enormous concern with Dominion and different states and maybe in yours. However we now have, we haven’t felt we wanted to go there, and simply to, , possibly put slightly totally different spin on what Mark is saying. Mark Meadows. Yeah, I wish to go additional, however we don’t really want to. We now have all of the votes we’d like. You understand, we gained the state. In case you took, these are probably the most minimal numbers, the numbers that I gave you. These are numbers which might be licensed, your absentee ballots despatched to vacant addresses, your, your out-of-state voters, 4,925.
You understand, once you add them up, it’s many extra instances, it’s many instances the 11,779 quantity. So we might undergo. We now have not gone by way of your Dominion, so we are able to’t give them blessing. I imply, in different states we predict we discovered great corruption with Dominion machines, however we’ll must see. However, however we, we solely misplaced the state by 11 thous — by, by that quantity, 11,000 votes and 779. So with that being mentioned, with simply what we now have. And, , with simply what we now have, we’re providing you with minimal, minimal numbers, we’re doing probably the most conservative numbers potential. We’re many instances, many, many instances above the, the margin. And so we don’t actually must, Mark — I don’t suppose we now have to undergo the machines as a result of, as a result of what’s the distinction between successful the election by two, two votes and successful it by half 1,000,000 votes? I believe I in all probability did win it by half a mill — I imply, , one of many issues that occurred, Brad, is we now have different folks coming in now from Alabama and from South Carolina and from different states, and so they’re saying, ‘It’s inconceivable so that you can have misplaced Georgia.’ We gained. You understand, in Alabama, we set a report, received the very best vote ever. In Georgia, we set a report with an enormous quantity of votes. And so they say, ‘It’s not potential to have misplaced Georgia.’
And I might inform you by our rallies, I might inform you by the rally I’m having on Monday night time, the place, they have already got traces of individuals standing out entrance ready. It’s simply not potential to have misplaced Georgia. It’s not potential. Once I heard it was shut, I mentioned there’s no manner. However they dropped a number of votes in there late at night time, that, Brad. And that’s what we’re engaged on very, very stringently. However no matter these votes, with all of it being mentioned, we misplaced by 11 to — basically 11,000 votes. And we now have many extra votes already calculated and licensed too. So I simply don’t know. You understand, Mark, I don’t know what’s the aim. I gained’t give Dominion a go as a result of we’ve discovered too many dangerous issues. However we don’t want Dominion or anything. We now have, we now have, we now have gained this election in Georgia based mostly on all of this. And there’s, there’s nothing unsuitable with saying that, Brad. You understand, I imply, having the, having an accurate. The folks of Georgia are offended, and these numbers are going to be repeated on Monday night time, together with others that we’re going to have by that point, that are rather more substantial even, and the folks of Georgia are offended, the folks of the nation are offended. And there’s nothing unsuitable with saying that, , um, that you simply’ve recalculated as a result of the two,236 and absentee ballots, I imply, they’re all precise numbers that had been, had been accomplished by accounting corporations, legislation corporations, and many others. And even should you lower ’em in half, lower ’em in half and lower ’em in half once more, it’s extra votes than we’d like.
RAFFENSPERGER: Properly, Mr. President, the problem that you’ve is the information you might have is unsuitable. We, we talked to the congressmen, and so they had been stunned. However they — I assume, there’s an individual named Mr. Brainard that got here to those conferences and introduced knowledge, and he mentioned that there was useless folks, I consider it was upward of 5,000. The precise quantity had been two. Two. Two those who had been useless that voted. And so, that’s unsuitable, that was two.
TRUMP: Properly, Cleta, how do you reply to that? I imply, you inform me.
CLETA MITCHELL, Trump lawyer: I’ll say Mr. Secretary, one of many issues that we now have requested, and we did — What we mentioned was, and should you have a look at, should you learn our petition, it mentioned that we took the names and beginning years and, , we had sure info obtainable to us. We now have requested out of your workplace for information that solely you might have. And so we mentioned there’s a universe of people that have the identical title and identical beginning yr and died. However we don’t have the information that you’ve, and one of many issues that we now have been suggesting formally and informally for weeks now’s to attempt, is so that you can make obtainable to us the information that will be vital to verify —