Since late January of 2012, the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard has as soon as every week featured a “Mainstream Media Scream” choice in his “Washington Secrets and techniques” column. For every decide, often posted on-line on Monday, I present an evidence and advocate a “scream” ranking (scale of 1 to 5).
This put up comprises the “Liberal Media Screams” beginning in January 2021.
> For all of 2020. For all of 2019. For all of 2018. (Re-named “Liberal Media Scream” as of June 11, 2018.) “Mainstream Media Screams” for:
> July-December 2017 posts; January by way of June 2017; July to December 2016; for January to June 2016; for July to December 2015; for January to June 2015. (2012-2014 are featured on MRC.org: For 2014; for June 17, 2013 by way of the top of 2013. And for January 31, 2012 by way of June 11, 2013.)
Examine Bedard’s “Washington Secrets and techniques” weblog for the newest selection and his different Washington insider posts. Every week, this web page can be up to date with Bedard’s newest instance of the worst bias of the week.
(For extra of the worst liberal media bias, browse the Media Analysis Middle’s Notable Quotables with compilations of the newest outrageous, generally humorous, quotes within the liberal media.)
■ New on August 2: Liberal Media Scream: New CNN low, evaluating Trump ‘cult’ to Jonestown bloodbath
See the posting on the Washington Examiner‘s web site the place you may watch the video and skim Baker’s evaluation. Per week later, Bedard’s article can be posted right here.
■ July 26: Liberal Media Scream: The worst of Trump hater Carl Bernstein
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the newest anti-Trump outburst from Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein — and his worst hits checklist.
Sunday on CNN’s Dependable Sources, his predominant venting venue, he overvalued his prior assaults on former President Donald Trump, claiming that the Republican is a “struggle prison.”
His over-the-top invective towards Trump is nothing new, as a fast journey by way of the CNN archive exhibits. In 2017, he declared of Trump’s determination to take away the FBI director, “This can be a probably extra harmful scenario than Watergate.” In 2020, he was repeating his Watergate comparability as he charged Trump allies had “now joined palms with a tyrant.” Final fall, he described Trump’s response to COVID as “homicidal negligence” earlier than declaring “we’re witnessing the Mad King within the remaining days of his reign.”
Our Liberal Media Scream companion Brent Baker, the vice chairman of the Media Analysis Middle, drew up an inventory of Bernstein’s best anti-Trump hits:
♦ “I believe it is a probably extra harmful scenario than Watergate, and we’re at a really harmful second. And that’s as a result of we’re trying on the risk that the president of america and people round him throughout an election marketing campaign colluded with a hostile international energy to undermine the premise of our democracy: free elections.” — Dependable Sources, Might 14, 2017.
♦ “Let’s take a look at what Watergate was as a result of it was a few prison president who acted as a tyrant. And what we now have right here now’s the Senate of america, by way of the Republican management and membership, has now joined palms with a tyrant.” — CNN Newsroom, Jan. 31, 2020.
♦ “His response has been homicidal negligence. He has failed to guard the American folks and reasonably to place his personal curiosity of reelection and holding on to the workplace of the presidency in entrance of the well being and well-being of the American folks.” — CNN Newsroom, Oct. 3, 2020.
♦ “We’re witnessing the Mad King within the remaining days of his reign, prepared to scorch the Earth of his nation and convey down the entire system to undermine our complete democracy, strip it of its legitimacy, poison the boldness of our folks in our establishments and the structure for Donald Trump’s personal petulant, egocentric, rabid ends.” — CNN New Day, Nov. 20, 2020.
♦ “I believe we have to calmly step again and perhaps take a look at Trump in a special context. He’s America’s, our personal American struggle prison, of a sort we’ve by no means skilled earlier than … In worldwide legislation, there have been, quote, ‘crimes towards humanity.’ I believe what we’re speaking about, Trump’s crimes as an American struggle prison in his personal nation that he has perpetrated upon our folks.” — Dependable Sources, Sunday.
Baker explains our weekly decide: “Bernstein is a one-note musician, attempting each week to ramp up his singularly targeted anger to get some consideration. With a lot unhinged animus for Trump, it’s onerous to think about anybody considers his rants something greater than leisure from a man attempting, however failing, to match Trump’s ability at making a unfavorable public picture for his opponents by way of inventive terminology.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ July 19: Liberal Media Scream: Press ought to ‘transfer on’ from steadiness to liberal advocacy
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream includes a Washington Put up columnist telling it like it’s: Liberal advocacy within the media is the proper bias.
On CNN’s Dependable Sources present, Perry Bacon Jr. argued the information media “ought to transfer on from” caring about attracting simply as many Republicans as Democrats to learn or view their reporting. Choosing up on a column he wrote final week, Bacon mentioned the “core mission” of the media is to current “details” and “an evidence-based view of the world.”
However his “details,” in fact, overlap with the priorities of liberals, not unusual for Washington Put up columnists who’re given extra freedom of their work. For instance, he mentioned, “We within the media are biased when it comes to we assist vaccines. We within the media rent LGBT workers. We’re biased towards bans towards trans or homosexual folks.”
Give credit score to the Washington Put up for highlighting the bias of its scribes. In Bacon’s bio, for instance, it gives up his protection space. Below “The Democratic Get together,” it says, “The Democratic Get together is mostly transferring in a pro-equality (racial, financial, class, gender, sexual id) course.” Below “The Republican Get together,” it reads, “The Republican Get together is transferring in an anti-democratic, anti-Democrats course.”
Bacon on Sunday’s Dependable Sources on CNN:
“They need to transfer on from this concept that they’re attempting to, you realize, the viewers is attempting to get equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats or to not offend Mitch McConnell’s workplace or no matter it’s, and to essentially get targeted on what’s our core mission. And I’d argue the core mission is to current details, current proof, current an evidence-based view of the world, and to additionally, in my opinion, defend the concepts of a democracy and a multiracial democracy, I believe, is a part of what the media ought to be doing. What that appears like, I believe, is defending and being unabashed. Vaccines work. Joe Biden received the election. Black lives do matter, and we ought to be trustworthy about when black persons are discriminated towards unfairly. And to type of begin from a spot of, do we now have some clear-cut values we are able to articulate — articulate these indirectly on our web sites, in our programming, to be trustworthy about like, we’re attempting to struggle this bias factor.
“We’re biased when it comes to details. We within the media are biased when it comes to we assist vaccines. We within the media rent LGBT workers. We’re biased towards bans towards trans or homosexual folks. So we will be trustworthy about these biases, and type of, we’re in favor of a multiracial democracy. That’s why journalists behave the best way they did when Trump — we’re in favor of the one who received the election being president. So as soon as we’re trustworthy about these issues, which will flip off some folks, however it is going to assist us be higher as establishments and higher as journalists if our first aim is, listed here are the values we acknowledged we try to implement, after which secondary, we are going to take the viewers who embraces these values.
“That doesn’t imply our values are Democratic and never Republican, however our values that we’re speaking about are small-D democratic and never authoritarian or one thing like that. So I believe if we get clear on values, in fact, the media is for, towards authoritarian folks like Trump. The media can not exist in a practical approach with out having, you realize, with out having a free press, which dictators often oppose.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “I suppose Bacon ought to get some factors for honesty, for articulating how, presumably, lots of his colleagues really feel, that equity and steadiness ought to be damned in favor of declaring liberal presumptions because the factual actuality and dismiss opposite views as unworthy. However removed from fixing journalism, Bacon’s prescription will guarantee its demise as media figures not fake to be something however left-wing political activists.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ July 12: No Liberal Media Scream this week.
■ July 5: Liberal Media Scream: ABC analysts huff at justices over voting determination
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options two ABC This Week commentators making a brand new argument for broad open voting — some folks can’t afford sufficient gasoline to get meals and vote.
The Thursday Supreme Courtroom ruling, upholding two provisions of Arizona’s voting guidelines which required folks to vote at their very own precinct and barred poll harvesting, irked the 2 who cited anecdotes about difficulties encountered by poor and minority voters.
LZ Granderson, an ABC Information podcaster, ESPN contributor, and Los Angeles Occasions columnist, mentioned the justices have been out of contact as a result of they aren’t poor: “They’re all privileged.” He recalled his “mother scraping collectively 50 cents, 75 cents, a greenback only for gasoline to get to a grocery retailer” and so “now you’re forcing minorities to resolve” between attending to a polling place or shopping for groceries.
Washington Put up reporter Mary Jordan cited misdeeds she noticed in Mississippi with “every kind of soiled methods being performed about closing polls, switching the place you’re alleged to be, telling folks they’re within the incorrect place even when they’re in the best place.”
From the Sunday, July 4 roundtable after host Martha Raddatz characterised the ruling as “not precisely consistent with public opinion,” an evaluation based mostly on an ABC Information/Washington Put up ballot:
LZ Granderson: “No, in fact not, however they don’t actually care about public opinion, proper? In the event that they did, then all of this laws could be checked out otherwise. You understand, the factor that basically frustrates me most is the justices acknowledged that these new legal guidelines does impression minorities. They didn’t deny that facet of it. They simply mentioned that the inconvenience of it isn’t so nice. Effectively, they’re all privileged. And I grew up poor. I keep in mind my mother scraping collectively 50 cents, 75 cents, a greenback only for gasoline to get to a grocery retailer. If you try this to polling locations, now you’re forcing minorities to resolve whether or not or not they’re going to speculate cash, gasoline cash, to get to the polling locations that at the moment are additional away or do I exploit this gasoline cash to get to the grocery retailer or do I to get to work. They’re privileged, saying that this doesn’t inconvenience them sufficient. Effectively, how have you learnt? When was the final time you have been that poor?”
Mary Jordan: “I’d like to speak about, I went down in Mississippi, and I noticed this. And on the morning of the election, folks would end up and the polling place could be closed within the place the place there have been loads of Democratic voters. And so the query then was do I drive, so I spend one other 45 minutes within the automotive to go there and wait in a very lengthy line? There’s every kind of soiled methods being performed about closing polls, switching the place you’re alleged to be, telling folks they’re within the incorrect place even when they’re in the best place. I believe if folks actually knew what was occurring, as a result of it differs state by state and county by county, they might suppose, you realize what, it’s July 4th right here. It’s all about voting, proper? It’s probably the most elementary of rights. We had the Boston tea occasion as a result of we couldn’t vote, and we have been getting taxed. And it’s type of surprising that proper now, lots of people don’t have the identical entry to votes as different Individuals.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Granderson and Jordan gave the impression to be trying to find anecdotes to justify their place towards very fundamental voter integrity guidelines and got here up with fairly weak ones. Making everybody vote at their native precinct is the last word in equity and requires the least bus cash whereas eliminating numerous alternatives for confusion and fraud. As for all of the misdeeds Jordan noticed in areas ‘the place there have been loads of Democratic voters,’ which drive folks to ‘spend one other 45 minutes within the automotive,’ that’s simply what the Arizona native precinct rule is supposed to stop. And which occasion controls the election techniques just about in every single place the place minorities and Democrats are the bulk? It’s not wealthy, privileged Supreme Courtroom justices.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ June 28: Liberal Media Scream: Taxpayer-subsidized PBS is extra DNC than the DNC
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the clearest instance but that taxpayer-subsidized PBS is changing into an arm of the Democratic Nationwide Committee.
Showing on Meet the Press, activist journalist Yamiche Alcindor echoed the DNC speaking factors on state-passed voting reforms, ignoring a number of truth checks which have proven that some, notably Georgia, have adopted extra progressive voting modifications than President Joe Biden’s residence state or uber-liberal Connecticut.
As an alternative, the brand new host of PBS’s Washington Week and the White Home correspondent for PBS NewsHour declared “an existential disaster in America” and went as far as to say that states are taking votes away from folks “if we don’t like the best way that you simply voted.”
And, as she has earlier than, she gave the president a little bit recommendation, this time to “speed up his nominees to the courts.”
From the roundtable on Sunday’s Meet the Press:
“If you speak to people who find themselves actually aware of the eager about this, it’s that Democrats notice that they may, that it’s not going to solely be solved in a legislative approach. There needs to be a judicial and a court docket battle forward. And after I’m speaking to civil rights activists, they are saying they wish to see two particular issues: One, the DOJ actually going after state legislatures. So, it’s to say you can’t simply, not solely voters, not solely suppress folks’s votes, however nullify folks’s votes. So, that may’t be the best way that America works. The second factor that they wish to see is extra judges on the court docket. They wish to see President Biden speed up his nominees to the courts. So, I believe that’s additionally the place that is going.
“That is an existential disaster in America. Who can really get the entry to vote? Republicans in state legislatures are saying in case you, basically, and critics would say that ‘if we don’t like the best way that you simply voted, we are going to take away your vote.’ And that, I believe, is an actual drawback. If you happen to take a look at Philadelphia state legislatures and in the event that they, and whether or not or not they will even nullify 1,000,000 votes in Philly — that could possibly be an issue and a giant drawback.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker defined our weekly decide: “If there was any doubt remaining about whether or not Alcindor is a journalist or a Democratic political activist pretending to be a journalist, she eradicated it with this bombast, which has no foundation in actuality and echos probably the most excessive rhetoric of far-left activists. No one’s vote is being taken away anyplace. In actual fact, whereas some Republican states have set guidelines to ensure a number of days of early voting, some states, comparable to Democratic-run Connecticut, haven’t any early voting.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ June 21: Liberal Media Scream: Chuck Todd calls parent-led opposition to crucial race principle faux
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the dismissal by NBC’s Chuck Todd of parent-led opposition to the instructing of crucial race principle in faculties.
“It’s manufactured,” he mentioned, brushing apart all of the protests, even many close to Washington the place Todd studies from, of public faculty dad and mom lining as much as oppose CRT. His Meet the Press visitor, pollster Cornell Belcher, went additional, blaming former President Trump and “tribalism.”
In actual fact, polls present that even within the liberal Washington suburbs, the bulk oppose instructing the revisionism that America is principally racist.
From the roundtable on the June 20 Meet the Press, with feedback first from PBS NewsHour chief correspondent Amna Nawaz and Republican pollster Brad Todd:
AMNA NAWAZ: Yeah. And particular to this concept of crucial race principle, I’ve to let you know, I simply spent a while reporting on this county in Virginia about an hour outdoors of Washington. And to your level, that is one thing that’s mobilizing folks and resonating very deeply. It was a few 100 diploma day. Dozens and dozens and dozens of fogeys, principally white, on this largely prosperous county, confirmed up to a faculty board assembly, for a lot of of them, the very first faculty board assembly they’d ever attended, particularly due to this one concern.
BRAD TODD: That’s essential to notice, that you simply talked about crucial race principle a pair occasions. This can be a parent-led backlash on the grassroots stage.
CHUCK TODD: It’s manufactured, after which type of appears to have been lit, the fireplace was lit.
BRAD TODD: I disagree. I believe it began as a result of dad and mom have had it with the schooling forms after COVID. They’re fed up with it. They have a tendency to belief Democrats relating to schooling funding, however they belief Republicans on schooling accountability. I believe that what the backlash you’re seeing on crucial race principle in faculties is one other instance of fogeys attempting to carry educators accountable.
CORNELL BELCHER: It’s coordinated. It’s aggressive. It’s intentional, proper? That is, that is a part of the tribalism play. The crucial race principle is yet one more software within the racial tribal boogeyman’s toolbox to drive and inflame tribalism, which Republicans suppose helps them in elections. That is Trump 2.0. That is, it’s a continuation of this, proper? Essential race principle is an, an arcane type of very best. Why is it entrance and middle proper now? The identical cause that Mitch McConnell assaults Stacey Abrams when she got here out for the voting invoice. It’s racial. It’s tribalism. We’ve seen it develop beneath Trump. And that is half and partial of it. And so they suppose this helps ignite their base. There’s no approach this isn’t grassroots. And, Brad, you realize that is organized and is being paid for.
CHUCK TODD: However, you realize, Ashley-
BRAD TODD: We’re not excellent at organizing something on our facet.
CORNELL BELCHER: You all are higher than us.
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Typical of conceited information media figures, dismissing grassroots issues as ‘manufactured’ and racist, as if on their very own dad and mom can’t acknowledge extremist racial instructing that may additional divide the nation. And it takes chutzpah for Belcher to accuse conservatives of ‘Trump 2.0’ and using ‘the racial tribal boogeyman’s toolbox to drive and inflame tribalism,’ when liberals have spent the final months racializing efforts to go voter integrity legal guidelines by calling them ‘Jim Crow 2.0.’”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ June 14: Liberal Media Scream: GQ journo says US could also be worse than Russia on human rights
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream includes a prize-winning Russian-born journalist suggesting that President Joe Biden has no standing to problem Russian President Vladimir Putin on human rights.
Julia Ioffe, showing on MSNBC, mentioned america fails the ethical superiority take a look at due to “voter suppression” and police “consistently” killing black folks.
Ioffe, who writes for GQ and different websites, mentioned, “It’s a lot tougher to speak to Vladimir Putin about human rights once we nonetheless haven’t cleaned up our mess at residence.” And, she added, “Russians are seeing precisely what we’re seeing: the voter suppression legal guidelines, the, you realize, slide towards minority rule, the undermining of our personal democracy.”
Ioffe on Morning Joe right now:
“I did wish to return shortly to the purpose of ‘whataboutism.’ In fact, it’s a approach of not answering the query, but it surely works on many individuals as a result of they all the time begin with a grain of reality, proper? And, you realize, it’s fascinating. Sure, the Soviet Union consistently talked concerning the violation of the civil rights of African-Individuals in America within the ’50s and ’60s and even going again to the ’30s. And one of many causes that the Civil Rights Act was handed and that the American president bought behind it was to type of take this card out of the palms of the Soviets.
“And, you realize, President Biden, politically talking, will not be going into this assembly with a fantastic hand of playing cards, both. You understand, Russians are seeing precisely what we’re seeing: the voter suppression legal guidelines, the, you realize, slide towards minority rule, the undermining of our personal democracy. So it’s a lot tougher to speak to, you realize, we’re seeing black women and men being killed by police consistently on this nation, so it’s a lot tougher to speak to Vladimir Putin about human rights once we nonetheless haven’t cleaned up our mess at residence.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Ioffe not solely returned to ‘whataboutism,’ however she returned to the left-wing’s ethical equivalence between the U.S. and Soviet Union of the Chilly Conflict years when all too many journalists have been extra upset by what President Reagan mentioned concerning the Soviet Union than the human rights violations dedicated by the Soviets. She’s now justifying Putin’s tackle the U.S. by treating some shortcomings of the U.S., and democratic debate inside our nation about find out how to enhance these shortcomings, with a Russian dictator who has little interest in civil rights for anybody as he suppresses dissent, utilizing unjustified incarceration and homicide as his instruments.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ June 7: Liberal Media Scream: CNN’s Stelter offers the total Monty to Biden’s Jen Psaki
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN media critic Brian Stelter’s “interview” of White Home press secretary Jen Psaki, a show of how the liberal cable channel has whipsawed from ripping the Trump administration to fawning over the Biden crew.
Simply think about his first query throughout his Sunday present.
“What do you suppose we get incorrect?” Stelter requested.
That was adopted up with questioning, “what’s your recommendation” for journalists “to remain near the reality on this world of lies?”
Then, after noting that he and Psaki have younger youngsters, he requested, “What sort of nation is that this going to be when they’re our age? Do you concern that, given the craziness we’re seeing from the GOP? Do you concern that for our youngsters, your youngsters and mine?”
Stelter sympathetically arrange the phase, recorded on Friday and aired on Sunday’s Dependable Sources: “On this period of media bunkers and various realities, the White Home press secretary faces some distinctive challenges. So let’s hear from Jen Psaki to get her perspective practically 5 months into the job and about what may lie forward.”
A few of his “questions” to Psaki:
♦ “Busy summer time forward, infrastructure, election reform. What does the press get incorrect when protecting Biden’s agenda? If you watch the information, once you learn the information, what do you suppose we get incorrect?”
♦ “For different P.R. professionals who watch what you do, for journalists who watch what you do, what’s your recommendation for them about attempting to remain as near the reality on this world of lies?”
♦ “I do know that is usually adversarial, but it surely additionally needs to be practical. Is the connection between the White Home and the press corps now a minimum of practical in ways in which it wasn’t within the Trump years?” (Psaki: “I believe so.”)
♦ “That is what I actually wished to ask you. You talked about your youngsters, you’ve got a daughter going into kindergarten, I’ve a daughter going into pre-Okay. And I believe to myself, what sort of nation is that this going to be when they’re our age? Do you concern that, given the craziness we’re seeing from the GOP? Do you concern that for our youngsters, your youngsters and mine?”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “My how the world has modified from the Trump years when CNN handled White Home officers as enemies who have to be discredited. Now, White Home workers are their buddies and allies. Stelter ought to be embarrassed by such a efficiency after years of disdain for Trump’s politics and press secretaries. However he received’t be. On this interview he acted extra like a groveling scholar craving for his professor’s approval (‘Inform me what I’m doing incorrect,’ ‘How can we be a truthful as you?’), adopted by attempting to indicate his shared disdain for her political opponents, than any type of journalist holding these in energy to account.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ Might 31: Liberal Media Scream: ‘Some issues could also be true, even when Donald Trump mentioned them’
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream includes a high critic of the Trump years, ABC’s Jonathan Karl, who lastly mentioned out loud what supporters of President Donald Trump already knew: The White Home press corps had such contempt for the president that they dismissed all the pieces he mentioned.
Or, in Karl’s phrases, “some issues could also be true, even when Donald Trump mentioned them.”
Karl on Sunday’s This Week grudgingly conceded that Trump could have been appropriate in pointing to a lab in Wuhan, China, because the supply of COVID-19. He blamed Trump, not journalists, for ignoring the lab because the supply due to how Trump used “racist” phrases in describing the virus.
In the course of the roundtable phase on This Week, after host Martha Raddatz urged “some folks have egg on their face” for being so dismissive of the likelihood that the COVID-19 virus got here out of a Chinese language lab, Karl mentioned:
“Sure, I believe lots of people have egg on their face. This was an concept that was first put ahead by Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, Donald Trump. And look, some issues could also be true, even when Donald Trump mentioned them. And there was — as a result of Trump was saying a lot else that was simply uncontrolled, and since he was, you realize, making a frankly racist enchantment speaking about ‘kung-flu’ and the ‘China virus,’ his notion that he put ahead that this will have, or that he mentioned flatly that this got here from that lab, was broadly dismissed. However really, there’s some actual cause — we don’t know, by the best way, we nonetheless don’t know, we completely don’t know, however now, critical persons are saying it wants a critical inquiry.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Karl mentioned out loud what everybody already presumed: So many within the Washington press corps had such contempt for President Trump that they dismissed something he mentioned they may characterize of their minds as coming from foul motives. Thus, journalists proudly rationalized placing their prejudices first. However that meant the media failed in its fundamental obligation to tell the general public of one of the best info out there concerning the supply of a pandemic which has killed 3.5 million worldwide.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ Might 24: No Liberal Media Scream this week
■ Might 17: Liberal Media Scream: Chuck Todd doesn’t wish to be known as liberal, ‘Don’t begin that!’
(Washington Examiner put up)
The query on this week’s Liberal Mainstream Scream is that this: Can NBC Meet the Press host Chuck Todd deal with the reality?
A solution got here in his interview with Texas Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw after Todd hit him for 5 questions on the elimination of Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney because the No. 3 Home chief after she refused to cease criticizing former President Donald Trump on his election fraud claims.
An exacerbated Crenshaw, after watching the liberal media flip the ouster into the following catastrophe for the GOP, blurted out, “You guys within the press love doing this” and “I get it, proper? The press is basically liberal. They’re largely pro-Democrat.”
Todd wouldn’t hear it and tried to take again the dialog. “No, no, no, no, don’t begin that … There’s nothing lazier. There’s nothing lazier than that,” he mentioned.
Todd tried repeatedly to get Crenshaw to denounce his Republican colleagues and Trump in a sequence of questions, beginning with asking him to agree that “Liz Cheney was kicked out of management just because she wouldn’t carry the water of former President Trump’s election lies.” He adopted up with “Why ought to anyone consider a phrase you say if the Republican occasion itself doesn’t have credibility?” and “Do any of your critiques come throughout as credible in case you can’t settle for the basic indisputable fact that our democracy held a free and honest election?”
He then pressed Crenshaw to backtrack from ever asking courts to assessment some election processes, resulting in this change on the Sunday program:
CHUCK TODD: This is a matter that many individuals have, is that you simply’re sitting right here attempting to, attempting to say, ‘No, no, no, no, I simply had a selected query,’ but what you probably did will get weaponized by the previous president. Did you see the rantings of him yesterday? And to the purpose the place a Republican official in Maricopa County known as the previous president ‘unhinged.’ You understand, I perceive you guys wish to put this behind you, however he’s the chief of your occasion, and he doesn’t cease speaking about this nonsense.
REP. DAN CRENSHAW: Chuck, the one — look, he’s one among many leaders within the occasion. He’s a former president. We’re 5 months into President Biden’s presidency, and there’s a time to maneuver on. And look, you guys within the press love doing this, and I, and I get it, proper? The press is basically liberal. They’re largely pro-Democrat.
TODD: No, no, no, no, don’t begin that. That’s the laz — look, there’s nothing lazier. There’s nothing lazier than that.
CRENSHAW: It’s. I imply, there’s loads of, there’s loads of causes to maintain this alive.
TODD: I perceive — what you’re attempting to appease —
CRENSHAW: And there’s lots of people in my occasion that take the bait. I’m not going to take the bait right here —
TODD: I’m not attempting to bait you. I’m attempting to — I’m attempting to determine —
CRENSHAW: What’s the end result you’re on the lookout for?
TODD: Why do you, why do you, why can we sit right here and have a political occasion that’s principally rallying round this weird lie and mythology that the previous president is doing, and also you guys simply wish to say, ‘Hey, pay no consideration to this,’ that, that by some means we within the press are bringing that up. It’s the previous president.
CRENSHAW: Effectively, I already, I already debunked the notion, I already debunked the notion that there is, that there’s no area within the occasion for that. Keep in mind, Liz received that first election —
CHUCK TODD: She’s not there now.
CRENSHAW: She received that first management vote, OK? And I advised you why. I helped you perceive why. And what I’m attempting that can assist you perceive is these will not be the telephone calls I get about this, about who’s the chief of the occasion, what’s occurring with Trump? My Republican supporters don’t ask me about Trump, they don’t ask me about what he mentioned, they’re not riled up about it. You understand what they’re asking about? What are we doing about over 1 / 4 million unlawful crossings on our border within the final two months? That’s what they’re asking about. How is that sustainable? What about my inflation? What about my financial savings that at the moment are much less precious due to rising inflation as a result of we’re spending cash that we don’t have.
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “There’s nothing lazier than a liberal journalist, within the midst of pursuing a liberal narrative, denying the plain actuality that the press and journalists are largely liberal. If Todd doesn’t need his visitor to name out his biased agenda, then he shouldn’t preserve asking a variation of the identical query time and again as a result of the visitor received’t accede to his left-wing speaking factors.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ New on Might 10: Liberal Media Scream: Six extra years of ‘Stacey Abrams for president’
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the newest and gushiest media profile of politician and writer (and surprise lady?) Stacey Abrams, who misplaced in her final election however who journalists consider can be president quickly.
CBS Sunday Morning larded on the compliments and promoted her presidential ambitions.
In a phase tied to plugging a brand new novel by Abrams, Erin Moriarty mentioned, “Your predominant character is all the time a girl of shade who’s good and gutsy and funky beneath stress. Briefly, Stacey Abrams.”
After hailing her efforts to counter Republican voter integrity guidelines, Moriarty celebrated how “making certain that proper to vote could sometime assist Abrams obtain her best dream: operating for president.”
From the Sunday version of the present:
JANE PAULEY: We’re in dialog this morning with Stacey Abrams, the Georgia politician who was a drive in final 12 months’s presidential election. However she’s a girl of many different skills, as she’ll inform Erin Moriarty …
MORIARTY: Stacey Abrams has all the time dreamed large and completed a lot, however there’s additionally one other facet to the political activist from Georgia.
ABRAMS: I believe folks can be shocked.
MORIARTY: Developing on Sunday Morning, a dialog with a girl of many skills and identities.
…
MORIARTY: Your predominant character is all the time a girl of shade who’s good and gutsy and funky beneath stress. Briefly, Stacey Abrams.ABRAMS: Effectively, I attempt to emulate my characters, and I attempt to have my characters mirror who I’m.
…
MORIARTY: Making certain that proper to vote could sometime assist Abrams obtain her best dream: operating for president.ABRAMS: Do I maintain it as an ambition? Completely. And much more importantly, when somebody asks me if that’s my ambition, I’ve a accountability to say sure for each younger lady, each individual of shade, each younger individual of shade who sees me and decides what they’re able to based mostly on what I believe I’m able to. Once more, it’s about you can’t have these stuff you refuse to dream of.
MORIARTY: With Georgia, Florida, and most not too long ago Texas, passing legal guidelines that restrict voting, Abrams is increasing Honest Struggle’s efforts across the nation. She has a digital ebook tour plan for her new novel and, in fact, extra books to write down, which leaves little time for anything. How do you’ve got any time for a private life?
ABRAMS: Effectively, let’s be clear. So Honest Struggle, there’s additionally the Southern Financial Development Mission, there’s Honest Depend, there’s writing —
MORIARTY: You’re making my level for me. You’re making my level!
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “It have to be good to be a liberal Democrat, really easy to get a pleasant profile from a significant media outlet selling your political ambitions. Moriarty is clearly a private admirer as she poured on the effusive reward, heralding Abrams for the way she has ‘completed a lot,’ citing her ‘many skills,’ and touting her as ‘good and gutsy.’ CBS by no means needed to determine her as a liberal or a Democrat. With that type of pleasure about her from a journalist, viewers knew she couldn’t be anything.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ Might 3: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC declares black Sen. Tim Scott a race traitor
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream featured a racist assault by a black MSNBC host on South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, additionally black, after he rebutted President Joe Biden’s joint session speech to declaring that America will not be racist.
Main the cable community’s assault was host Tiffany Cross, who denigrated Scott for having the gall to dispute the liberal line that America is racist.
She rolled out each racist phrase she might. Cross known as Scott “a stone idiot,” “slow-witted,” “a token,” and known as his factors “asinine,” all earlier than the very low blow that Harriet Tubman would have left Scott “behind.”
Cross, nevertheless, didn’t have an issue when Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris agreed america is “not a racist nation.”
From Saturday’s The Cross Connection on MSNBC:
Tiffany Cross: “This week, the only black Republican within the Senate sounded a stone idiot when he mentioned this.”
Scott, within the Republican response to Biden’s handle to a joint session of Congress: “Hear me clearly, America will not be a racist nation.”
Cross: “OK. Let’s be clear. Tim Scott doesn’t signify any constituency apart from the small variety of sleepy, slow-witted victims of Stockholm syndrome who get elevated to prominence for repeating a false narrative about this nation that makes conservative white folks really feel comfy as a result of once you converse an uncomfortable reality, like Nikole Hannah-Jones, the occasion that Scott claims will not be racist will get large mad and tries to silence you. Simply this week, Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell requested Schooling Secretary Miguel Cardona to scrap instructing the 1619 Mission in faculties as a result of it might ‘reorient the view of American historical past.’ Fortunate for McConnell, he has his personal faucet dancer to attempt to reorient the view of America for him.”
“There have been so many contradictions within the senator’s speech that it was clear not even Scott believed the phrases he was talking. I might go into element refuting every of his asinine factors, however he did that for me, and furthermore, a lesson I’ve discovered, don’t argue with folks Harriet Tubman would have left behind. And certain, Tim Scott has spoken out about his encounters with legislation enforcement, and he co-sponsored the anti-lynching invoice within the Senate, however there are two sides to each token. So thirsty for white approval, this dude really stood on the nationwide stage to defend the voter suppression legislation in Georgia despite the fact that, as of final month, 361 payments have been being launched in 47 states to maintain individuals who appear like him out of the poll field.
“The flexibility to disgrace the ancestors and appease the oppressors multi functional speech, that’s excessive, although not fairly just like the home violent extremism that the Division of Homeland Safety is investigating inside its personal ranks, thoughts you. However please, senator, say extra about how un-racist the nation is when you trot out that drained line about going from cotton to Congress to clown. Maybe this was merely Sen. Scott’s audition to be Sam Jackson’s understudy within the movie Django as a result of, as a descendant of the enslaved and rattling close to a every day survivor of institutional racism, I can guarantee you the query, ‘is America a racist nation?’, is one which has been requested and answered many occasions over.
“But we nonetheless love America. Not for what it was, however for what it could possibly be. On this one, you’re not solely on the incorrect facet of the aisle, Sen. Scott, however you’re embarrassingly on the incorrect facet of historical past, as properly.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “The 5 scream scale is probably not enough for this one. What a disgusting, hate-filled commentary full of non-public invective, excoriating a U.S. senator as some type of race traitor for daring to deviate from the left-wing line on how America is a racist nation and anybody who’s black should not stray from particular insurance policies advocated by the Democratic occasion. Cross exhibits how scared liberals are of opposite views, pouncing to silence any divergence from the left’s race orthodoxy earlier than it will probably get any consideration.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ April 26: Liberal Media Scream: DeSantis have to be high canine the best way media bark at him
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream exhibits the newest proof that the media view rising Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis as an enormous risk.
The identical group that likes to stay “Hate Has No Residence Right here” posters of their entrance yard has pulled out each nasty title and reference they will to belittle his enhancements within the state, which continues to see hoards transferring there from the north.
The newest: He’s the reincarnation of former Alabama segregationist Gov. George Wallace.
On MSNBC late final week, anchor Pleasure Reid went on a rant attempting to discredit DeSantis as a Wallace-inspired racist for signing a invoice to carry rioters accountable for damages and hurt to others. “It feels so George Wallace that I’m shocked that George Wallace didn’t really consider it again when he was governor of Alabama,” she mentioned.
After a visitor from Black Lives Matter declared, “That is straight out of the Jim Crow textbook,” and that “white supremacy is scared to loss of life of us,” Reid mentioned, “DeSantis seems to essentially wish to reenact your entire George Wallace historical past. I suppose he needs to be the modern-day George Wallace, as a result of he’s enacting a slew of legal guidelines that basically attempt to make it unlawful to protest within the state of Florida.”
One thing they didn’t spotlight: Wallace was a Democrat who pursued segregationist insurance policies, as others in his occasion had. He was standard sufficient that within the 1972 Democratic presidential primaries, he misplaced to George McGovern by simply 2 factors within the standard vote. He received the Maryland and Michigan primaries, amongst others, regardless of being shot in an assassination try.
From the Thursday, April 22 The ReidOut on MSNBC:
JOY REID: You understand, Brittany, this feels prefer it’s directed at y’all. That is directed at Black Lives Matter. It feels so George Wallace that I’m shocked that George Wallace didn’t really consider it again when he was governor of Alabama.
BRITTANY PACKNETT CUNNINGHAM, BLM ACTIVIST: Oh, that is straight out of the Jim Crow textbook, and let’s contextualize Jim Crow, lets? When black folks bought extra free, there have been new legal guidelines created to make us much less free. That is precisely what is going on proper now. What this really exhibits me, Pleasure, is that white supremacy is scared to loss of life of us, and it completely ought to be. That is what you do once you can not win honest and sq.. You suppress votes, and also you suppress voice. So, we now have to concentrate right here, as a result of the GOP performs the lengthy sport, and so they play the expansive sport. They plan far upfront. They gerrymander states in order that they will management statehouses, after which, they use all of that energy to keep up their energy and suppress us from a number of angles. So, then they make it unlawful to interact within the two most democratic practices you bought on this nation, and so they be certain to focus on black of us once they do it. That approach, amongst different issues, you may leverage the police that you simply’ve militarized to guard your techniques and to proceed to terrorize us. So, it’s our job to maintain them on the ropes, as a result of that is what desperation seems to be like, and I need them to remain determined. They know the way highly effective we’re. That’s why we’re seeing this.
REID: You understand, Rep. [Anna] Eskamani, the racist Miami sheriff who coined the time period ‘When the looting begins, the capturing begins’ was from South Florida. Donald Trump then turns round and quotes him. Ron DeSantis seems to essentially wish to reenact your entire George Wallace historical past. I suppose he needs to be the modern-day George Wallace, as a result of he’s enacting a slew of legal guidelines that basically attempt to make it unlawful to protest within the state of Florida, unlawful to the touch their valuable Accomplice statues from the dropping facet of the Civil Conflict, proper? However then we can also’t vote. That is Jim Crow in your state. What can Democrats do about it?
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Reid way back misplaced any pretense of being a journalist and is now only a left-wing political activist devoted to smearing and discrediting conservative politicians, particularly rising leaders like DeSantis who dare achieve traction on the Proper by going towards the woke far-left political narrative. She’s returned to her political roots. She labored for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential marketing campaign. Now, she’s engaged on behalf of your entire Democratic Get together to abet its most radical components.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams
■ April 19: No Liberal Media Scream this week
■ April 12: Liberal Media Scream: Smug shrugs from 60 Minutes on DeSantis hit job
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream turns to the sloppy 60 Minutes report final week on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and the TV information journal’s smug refusal to confess its reporting and enhancing failures in a narrative a Washington Put up media critic known as “a plume of innuendo.”
Below hearth for every week for suggesting the governor was in a “pay to play” scandal it by no means proved, 60 Minutes as an alternative supplied a giant “no matter” in response to critics.
At concern was a narrative two Sundays again by correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi, who urged DeSantis partnered with Florida’s Publix supermarkets to provide COVID-19 pictures after dishing contributions to him.
He denied the costs, however a lot of his clarification was edited out of the story, and media critics mentioned that the reporter made her case poorly. DeSantis known as the story a “large lie.”
Final night time, on the finish of the present, when letters are generally learn, Alfonsi didn’t pull again her story and as an alternative learn excerpts from three letters, beginning with how “some viewers, together with a retired newsman, applauded the story.”
She moved on to a girl who denounced CBS’s “shameful biased reporting,” then ended with a cutesy problem from a person who wrote, “I’ll solely watch” the present “yet another time. Simply to see in case you broadcast this message.”
From the conclusion of the April 11 60 Minutes:
Sharyn Alfonsi: “Within the mail this week, feedback on our story about disparities within the distribution of COVID-19 vaccine in Palm Seashore County, Florida. Viewers targeted on an change with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis at a press convention. Some viewers, together with a retired newsman, applauded the story.”
Studying a letter from Nick Boryack of Vero Seashore, Florida: “Ron DeSantis will proceed to disclaim, refute, name your reporting a witch hunt. I can solely hope that you simply proceed to analyze and expose the reality.”
Alfonsi: “However many extra feedback condemned our enhancing and reporting.”
Studying a letter from Amy Ernest of Houston, Texas: “Shameful biased reporting – that’s what you’re responsible of. You might be not journalists, however lobbyists and advocates.”
Alfonsi: “Then there was this:”
Alfonsi studying a letter from David Plewes of Lighthouse Level, Florida: “I’ve watched 60 Minutes for many years. After your biased piece on Governor DeSantis, I’ll solely watch it yet another time. Simply to see in case you broadcast this message.”
Alfonsi: “I’m Sharyn Alfonsi. We’ll be again subsequent week with one other version of 60 Minutes.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “A really distinguished instance of how the information media refuse to carry themselves accountable which supplies extra recent proof for why anybody proper of middle has no cause to ever belief journalists to be honest to a conservative elected official. After every week during which Democrats, and even liberal media observers, condemned 60 Minutes for a distorted story, the present did not admit its misdeeds or retract the story. As an alternative, they dug in, downgrading accountability to studying just a few random viewer feedback.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ April 5: Liberal Media Scream: PBS’s Yamiche Alcindor connects Georgia voting to George Floyd trial
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream exhibits the lockstep reactionaryism to Georgia’s new election reform legislation that truly expands some voting protections — however is seemingly too troublesome for critics to learn.
The checklist of these blasting it as racist is lengthy, however we characteristic PBS’s Yamiche Alcindor as a result of she took it one other step and tied it to the homicide trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who has been charged within the loss of life of George Floyd.
“Watching this [Chauvin] trial and watching what’s occurring in Georgia, they completely join,” she mentioned throughout Meet the Press on Sunday.
The Georgia legislation has divided partisans, particularly company America’s response, together with MLB’s determination final week to maneuver the annual All-Star Recreation out of Atlanta in protest. On the identical time, some information retailers have began to review the brand new legislation extra and located much less to complain about whereas noting that a number of different states have a lot stricter election guidelines.
From the present:
Yamiche Alcindor: “Effectively, the Chauvin trial, and that homicide trial within the loss of life of George Floyd, is related to voting rights as a result of, on the finish of the day, it’s about how African Individuals and whether or not African Individuals are allowed to outlive and thrive in America and are capable of have entry to the rules that America holds up as close to and pricey. And that, in fact, is democracy. Nevertheless it’s additionally your means to pursue happiness and to not have an officer kneel in your neck for 9 minutes and 29 seconds. Watching this trial and watching what’s occurring in Georgia, they completely join.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Alcindor displayed the all too typical perspective of journalists who don’t see something incorrect with presuming advocates of creating voting safer are not any totally different than enforcers of ‘Jim Crow’ or, as she charged, are against letting African Individuals ‘survive’ in America. Linking Georgia, which really expanded voting entry in a number of methods, to a homicide trial is an outrage and exhibits Alcindor is extra a far-left political advocate, who stirs up racial animosities to advance a trigger, than any type of dispassionate journalist.”
Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.
■ March 29: Liberal Media Scream: ‘Unhappy however true,’ Pleasure Reid agrees GOP would make Jesus endure
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream has an Easter and election angle, but it surely’s not very uplifting.
It includes a well-known Georgetown College professor condemning GOP election reform efforts in states comparable to Georgia and suggesting that the occasion is so racist and imply it might “go a legislation to maintain Jesus from getting a cup of water whereas he is dying on the cross.”
And, in fact, it led to Pleasure Reid, host of her present The ReidOut, agreeing with Professor Michael Eric Dyson.
The feedback got here whereas the nation is in a heated debate over election reform, with the GOP heading to tightening poll entry and Democrats transferring to open it as much as a nationwide mail-in system.
Reid’s present targeted on condemning the GOP, and Dyson mentioned Republican efforts like these in Georgia are going additional than previous segregationist Jim Crow legal guidelines. “The true faith, the true politics in America is whiteness and whiteness unhinged,” he mentioned.
Dyson on the Friday version of The ReidOut:
“I imply, President Biden is true. That is Jim Crow, that is Jane Crow …The true faith, the true politics in America, is whiteness and whiteness unhinged … I believe he’s considering it significantly when he sees the implications. What he must do is fill these busters with some concern of the federal government. These are the sort of people that would go a legislation to maintain Jesus from getting a cup of water whereas he is dying on the cross.”
Reid agreed: “Unhappy however true.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “A cute-sounding quip however with a tough edge simply earlier than Palm Sunday as MSNBC determined to showcase Dyson, a person who all the time sees racial animus motivating conservatives. It’s all a part of the far-left/information media joint effort to smear as racist anybody excited by retaining the voting system trustworthy, thus discrediting their issues with out having to deal with their substance.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ March 22: Liberal Media Scream: Seth Meyers rants towards rural whites, Structure
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream steps outdoors the standard lane of offended information media figures to NBC’s Late Night time present hosted by Seth Meyers and his 15-minute rant for H.R. 1, the “For the Individuals Act” election legislation, and towards the filibuster.
His was a sweeping condemnation of Republicans, rural Individuals, whites, and the Founding Fathers.
He opened Thursday by charging that the electoral system is “closely tilted towards a minority of voters which can be predominately white and rural, thanks largely to anti-majoritarian establishments just like the Electoral Faculty and the Senate.” He cited new Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock’s “impassioned speech in favor of sweeping voting reforms” and accused Republicans of pushing Jim Crow-style election modifications.
“Republicans tried to steal the final election by way of the courts. That didn’t work, so now they’re attempting to steal the following election by way of voter suppression. Nuking or altering the filibuster to cease them is an ethical necessity,” he urged in his “Nearer Look” phase:
A number of the lowlights:
“Our democracy as at present constituted is just not a stage enjoying area. In actual fact, it’s arguably by no means been a stage enjoying area, it’s closely tilted towards a minority of voters which can be predominately white and rural, thanks largely to anti-majoritarian establishments just like the Electoral Faculty and the Senate. Simply think about that proper now the Senate is evenly cut up 50-50 and but the 50 Senate Democrats signify practically 42 million extra Individuals than the 50 Senate Republicans. For instance, Wyoming with a inhabitants of about 580,000 folks, has two senators. And New York additionally has two senators, despite the fact that there are 580,000 folks simply on my co-op board. …
“I imply, simply think about the scope of how closely tilted our democratic establishments are towards Republicans. They’ve solely received the favored vote as soon as within the final 32 years, but, they’ve appointed a majority of Supreme Courtroom justices, they’ve misplaced the favored vote by practically 3 million. In 2016, misplaced the Home by the most important margin since Watergate in 2018, misplaced two Senate seats in traditionally purple Georgia this 12 months, and but, Mitch McConnell nonetheless principally will get a veto over what the Senate can or can not go. The one approach the Senate can get something achieved proper now’s by way of a course of known as finances reconciliation, which has extra guidelines than a Manhattan parking signal. …
“Warnock delivered an impassioned speech in favor of sweeping voting reforms, and he famous that the GOP assault on voting rights is probably the most ferocious assault on democracy because the period of Jim Crow.”
[Sen. Raphael Warnock: “We are witnessing right now a massive and unabashed assault on voting rights, unlike anything we’ve ever seen since the Jim Crow era. This is Jim Crow in new clothes.”]
“He’s proper. And the garments aren’t even good. I imply, take a look at this [picture of Trump], it seems to be like he was thrown bare within the dumpster behind a Palm Seashore pro-shop, and given 5 minutes to choose an outfit. It’s a very good Halloween costume if you wish to go as a misplaced grandpa at Disney World. Warnock was on the ground particularly to name for Senate passage of H.R. 1, a sweeping package deal of pressing voting reforms handed by the Home which can be desperately wanted to stage what’s at present a really lopsided enjoying area. H.R. 1 would fight just about each GOP voter suppression tactic by, amongst different issues, mandating nationwide early voting and no-excuse mail voting, instituting computerized and same-day voter registration, implementing public financing of elections, and banning congressional gerrymandering, amongst different issues. It’s additionally extremely standard in polls, even among the many majority of Republican voters. So, naturally, Republican politicians are dropping their minds over it. …
“Republicans tried to steal the final election by way of the courts. That didn’t work, so now they’re attempting to steal the following election by way of voter suppression. Nuking or altering the filibuster to cease them is an ethical necessity. We badly want sweeping reforms to make our democracy a stage enjoying area.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Meyers’s argument ought to be with the founders, not present-day Republicans. He’s upset that our constitutional system, with two senators from each state, is inhibiting the enactment of left-wing insurance policies, as if the Senate make-up is one thing new. He’s upset by Wyoming however ignores how the following least-populous state, Vermont, has a socialist and a left-wing Democrat for senators. H.R. 1 ought to be often called the ‘Allow Unlawful Voting Act,’ because it’s a grab-bag of left-wing insurance policies aimed toward making it simple for Democrats to get votes from these not certified to vote. The very fact Meyers is so enthusiastic about it demonstrates he’s a left-wing Democratic activist first, a comic a distant second.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ March 15: Liberal Media Scream: Meet the Press blames Trump for Cuomo refusing to stop
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the newest model of “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” this time on NBC’s Meet the Press.
Discussing embattled New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s refusal to step down over a few scandals, the tag crew of host Chuck Todd and visitor John Heilemann blamed Trump, suggesting that he set the “precedent” for refusing to stop when pressed by critics.
“He’s following what’s seen now because the Trump precedent,” mentioned Heilemann of Cuomo.
Todd turned on conservatives, calling them “enthusiastic about Cuomo’s downfall” when it’s been Democrats on the highest ranges calling the liberal governor to stop over COVID-19 and intercourse scandals.
From the roundtable on Sunday’s Meet the Press:
John Heilemann: “I believe, you realize, that the opposite factor that’s true is Cuomo is completely dug in. I believe the chance of Cuomo resigning is near zero. And I believe, you realize, he’s following proper now — uncomfortably for lots of Democrats — he’s following what’s seen now because the Trump precedent. You understand, if you’re decided sufficient, you’re shameless sufficient, you may maintain on.
“And so the query then simply turns into: Does he really get impeached, does he really get thrown out? And I believe that’s going to be — a big query round that’s going to be what further proof comes out over the approaching — perhaps sufficient now, however there’s going to be a big query of what else unfolds over the following couple weeks.”
Chuck Todd: “It does really feel like he’s forcing that. I’m glad you introduced up Trump there a minute, John. Lanhee [Chen], I need you to reply on one thing Tim Miller wrote within the Bulwark. He mentioned, ‘Dunking on Cuomo’s demise requires admitting that the opposite occasion has requirements and lays naked, as soon as once more, the cravenness of the excuse-making for Trump that saved the lights on for the previous 5 years.’ There’s loads of conservative media, acolytes, and propagandists which can be very enthusiastic about Cuomo’s downfall, however they appear to not be very self-reflective.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Trump Derangement Syndrome lives on, particularly with these within the media nonetheless upset Trump’s private foibles didn’t undermine assist amongst his followers. Heilemann and Todd can’t recover from their contempt for Trump and so nonetheless wish to scold his supporters for hypocrisy with out seeing any in themselves in cueing up a ‘Trump precedent’ to rationalize misbehavior by a liberal Democrat.”
Scream ranking: THREE out of FIVE Screams.
■ March 8: Liberal Media Scream: CNN anchor says Republicans don’t really feel ‘ache’ of individuals
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream takes a take a look at the in a single day bias on CNN, and it’s a doozy.
In accordance with CNN in a single day anchor Rosemary Church, Republicans are callous and heartless and may’t really feel the ache of these they signify. It reminded us of once they used to name CNN the “Clinton Information Community” for its supportive protection of the president who famously mentioned in his 1992 marketing campaign, “I really feel your ache.”
The feedback got here after Senate Republicans balked at approving the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending invoice that the GOP mentioned spends little or no on rapid coronavirus points.
Interviewing Ron Brownstein of the Atlantic, Church noticed urgency in advancing the Biden agenda.
The primary two inquiries to Brownstein from the Atlanta-based anchor for CNN Worldwide within the 3 a.m. hour of CNN Newsroom Dwell simulcast on the home facet:
“So President Biden’s COVID aid package deal cleared the Senate with none Republican assist Saturday. Now it’s heading again to the Home for a vote Tuesday. How seemingly is it that it’ll go this week? And the way crucial is it that this will get achieved and achieved quick?”
“How does all of this search for Republicans who didn’t get on board with serving to folks? They don’t really feel a lot of the ache that different Individuals are feeling throughout this pandemic, to allow them to’t start to grasp what persons are going by way of. How a lot of a barrier is that disconnect for a celebration already battling its personal id?”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Church completely encapsulates the presumptions of so many journalists who assume it’s past dispute that anybody who opposes a large new spending invoice is an out-of-touch and uncaring lout, that anybody who disagrees with their outlook has crass motives unfit of consideration. It’s the type of embedded bias which infuriates everybody proper of middle, however can’t be acknowledged by journalists like Church who’re blind to their very own bias.”
Scream ranking: FOUR out of FIVE Screams.
■ March 1: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC’s Ali Velshi says racism defines America
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options MSNBC host Ali Velshi condemning America as racist endlessly.
“Racism is one thing that has outlined america since its very founding,” mentioned the Kenyan-born former Canadian journalist on his present Velshi.
His feedback got here in introducing writer Heather McGhee on to speak about her ebook on racism. In his intro, he mentioned American whites are so racist that they are going to damage their very own financial future to cease blacks.
McGhee, writer of The Sum of Us: What Racism Prices Everybody and How We Can Prosper Collectively, agreed and supplied Obamacare for example of whites being racially pushed to oppose a useful program as a result of it was proposed by a black president.
From Saturday morning’s Velshi on MSNBC:
Ali Velshi: “Racism is one thing that has outlined america since its very founding. In actual fact, it infects practically all sides of American life, like healthcare, about which we simply heard. Nevertheless it additionally impacts our politics and our economics. The false perception that progress and prosperity for folks of shade comes on the expense of white folks has helped prop up racist techniques for generations. This zero-sum principle is what writer Heather McGhee tackles in her new ebook, ‘The Sum of Us: What Racism Prices Everybody and How We Can Prosper Collectively.’ In it, she examines the self-destructive discount of white supremacy and the way a lot we’ve misplaced economically as a rustic attributable to racism when it comes to a greenback quantity.
“One of many issues that appeals to me about your ebook is the dialogue that you’ve got about how folks, usually white folks or individuals who have energy and privilege in society, usually make selections that aren’t of their financial pursuits or work towards their very own prosperity as a result of they really feel like giving different folks, on this case, black folks, sure rights and privileges will take away a few of their very own.”
Heather McGhee: “That’s precisely proper. I imply, to remain on the problem of healthcare, which you have coated so properly, Ali, you realize, white persons are really the most important group of the uninsured, and but, ever because the Reasonably priced Care Act was signed by our first black president, the vast majority of white folks have disapproved of the gorgeous modest concept that’s Obamacare, and there’s an enormous correlation between racial resentment towards black folks and the southern, most often, states and in addition Maine, which is the whitest state within the nation, refusal to broaden Medicaid beneath Obamacare. So it’s this concept that authorities is on the facet of individuals of shade, and that’s the reason there’s such a fierce anti-government skepticism and suspicion among the many majority of white voters — the vast majority of white voters who’ve voted for the Republican Get together for president, I’ll remind you, ever since Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “As folks obsessed by race, Velshi and McGhee lack self-awareness in attributing racism to these with a special viewpoint. It’s unimaginable to have a rational coverage dialogue when so many liberals within the media hurl racism accusations in any respect these of 1 race who don’t purchase into the liberal agenda, as if they can’t have a logical cause for opposing the coverage apart from their presumed racism. It’s very harmful politics.”
Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.
■ February 22: Liberal Media Scream: Liberals rush to dump on Rush Limbaugh
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream takes observe of the loss of life of conservative speak radio icon Rush Limbaugh, who influenced many and even pushed some, notably former Vice President Mike Pence, to leap into politics.
Buddies and allies have been effusive of their reward.
So too was the hate from his foes, too many to checklist right here. However for example, we characteristic former New York Occasions media reporter Invoice Carter who disparaged Florida’s plans to honor the long-time resident.
Showing on CNN’s Dependable Sources, Carter, now a “media analyst” for CNN, contended Limbaugh didn’t deserve the eye given him by Gov. Ron DeSantis, who plans to decrease the state flag.
After host Brian Stelter requested him concerning the plan by DeSantis, Carter mentioned:
“Effectively, it’s type of surprising as a result of, I imply, to begin with, you realize the governor of Florida is simply enjoying for conservative consideration in doing that. However the justification is admittedly questionable.
“I imply, look, Limbaugh had an enormous following, and it was very fashionable amongst, you realize, a bunch of right-wing listeners. However he wasn’t a heroic determine. I imply, he had loads of incidents that have been extraordinarily questionable, and his views have been fairly ugly, and so they damage lots of people. They damage some folks personally.
“And I believe – you realize, there have been an terrible lot of people who find themselves justifiably saying why are you celebrating a man who attacked Barack Obama on race, who sang ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ and every kind of extraordinarily outrageous issues that, frankly, the conservatives liked. They liked him for that. And he established the model. He did. That was a model. However to make it a heroic factor or one thing that ought to be celebrated like, you realize, a struggle hero, I discover that fairly questionable.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Fairly commonplace liberal ‘standard knowledge’ right here from Carter, and that’s the frustration. You’d hope a reporter with a profession protecting the media might rise above simply passing alongside liberal bromides and, a minimum of within the days after his passing, would provide one thing constructive a few man who earned the loyalty of hundreds of thousands for greater than thirty years and impressed generations of Individuals about the advantages of conservative coverage options.”
Ranking: 3 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ February 15: Liberal Media Scream: CNN’s Don Lemon goes there and blames ‘horrible Reagan’
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options ranting CNN host Don Lemon tying all the pieces he doesn’t wish to one of the standard presidents in United States historical past: Ronald Reagan.
“Reagan was horrible,” mentioned Lemon, who urged that the Republican’s two-term presidency paved the best way for the Capitol riots.
Shouting over fellow CNN host Chris Cuomo, Lemon mentioned Republicans are additionally dangerous for respecting Reagan.
“They maintain him as much as a gold commonplace. If you take a look at what he really completed, he didn’t,” he mentioned.
From the Thursday, Feb. 11 CNN Tonight, through the handoff from Chris Cuomo’s 9 p.m. present to Lemon’s 10 p.m. present:
CHRIS CUOMO: Reagan and Bush Republicans have been nothing like these guys.
DON LEMON: I don’t find out about that.
CUOMO: Simply the problem of immigration. Take a look at how Reagan and George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush talked about immigration.
LEMON: Reagan was the primary presidential election that I voted in. And pay attention, … I’m simply saying that folks maintain him as much as be — Reagan was not excellent. Reagan was horrible when it got here to—
CUOMO: Good? He gave us one of many greatest deficits we’ve ever seen, and he completely fed the divide.
LEMON: That is what I imply. They all the time maintain him up as a gold commonplace. However once you take a look at what he really completed, he didn’t. He was horrible when it got here to racial points. He was horrible when it got here to the AIDS disaster. He was horrible when it got here to uniting the nation. He didn’t unite the nation — he was a divider. And they also maintain him up as a gold commonplace. … I simply suppose it’s levels, however I believe the Republican Get together has been transferring on this course endlessly.
Once more, they’re the occasion of all the pieces that they’re attempting to fake that they’re not. Now saying, “The folks within the Capitol, that’s not us.” Sure, it’s you! “The people who have been in Charlottesville, that’s not us.” Sure, it’s you! These persons are not marching for Democrats. And this complete bizarre factor that they preserve saying, “What concerning the riots and the demonstration that occurred this summer time?” That’s apples and oranges. To begin with, the demonstrations, the protests have been for one thing that’s actual. It was for inequality. It was for police brutality. It was for all these issues. It was individuals who have been rising up for his or her rights. What occurred on the Capitol was constructed on a lie.
Media Analysis Middle Vice President for Analysis and Publications Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Such disdain for the late former president, who’s a hero to conservatives and an inspiration to many oppressed by communism all over the world, exhibits the baselessness of the widespread media line that they needed to be hostile to Donald Trump as a result of he posed a brand new type of harmful and racist risk to democracy and all that’s good about america. If Lemon had a CNN present within the Nineteen Eighties he would have been simply as hostile to Reagan, calling him a racist night time after night time, as he was and is to Trump. Conservative presidents come and go, however the media contempt for them by no means wavers.”
Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ February 8: Liberal Media Scream: Reporter decries ‘ex-boyfriend…abuse’ from Workforce Trump
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream had loads of selections from reporters by no means happier than to have a brand new administration that thinks like they do to report on.
However just one expressed the aid she felt in attending to cowl the Democratic Biden administration after the “dangerous ex-boyfriend” abuse she felt coping with Workforce Trump.
On CNN on Sunday, Yahoo Information White Home correspondent Brittany Shepherd got here down onerous on former Trump press secretary Kayleigh McEnany. She in contrast McEnany’s White Home briefings to “having a very dangerous ex-boyfriend. We have been getting basically abused by Kayleigh for thus lengthy.”
And worse, she charged that McEnany incited folks to “go to lethal ends for some folks with loss of life threats.”
However now, with spokeswoman Jen Psaki, “It’s very refreshing.”
Shepherd on CNN’s Dependable Sources:
“It’s been actually refreshing to have briefings on daily basis and to even know who the senior officers speaking to Biden are. We weren’t getting that in any of the Trump years, particularly in these waning days of the McEnany briefings.
“And it’s refreshing, I do type of put it in direction of like having a very dangerous ex-boyfriend. We have been getting basically abused by Kayleigh for thus lengthy, or a minimum of she was calling us faux information and inciting her followers and followers of the president to not solely harass us on-line however clearly go to lethal ends for some folks with loss of life threats.
“Now, we now have Jen and your entire Biden crew. It’s very refreshing. Nevertheless it’s essential to do not forget that the bar has actually been left on the ground, and simply having the ability to present up and clear it isn’t sufficient.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Shepherd exemplifies the hostility the White Home press corps had towards Kayleigh McEnany and all issues Trump, mixed with their keen embrace of the brand new administration, fast to hail Biden’s press crew as ‘very refreshing.’ It’s as if Shepherd simply bought a job switch from an workplace full of individuals she finds disreputable to a brand new workplace full of people that encourage her.”
Ranking: 3 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ February 1: Liberal Media Scream: New excessive in CNN bias, blames GOP for ‘divided America’
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream includes a new excessive within the anti-GOP bias proven by CNN, this time blaming the political divide on the Tea Get together, Sarah Palin, Roger Ailes, Fox Information, former Home Speaker Newt Gingrich, and, in fact, former President Donald Trump.
Over one hour final night time, Fareed Zakaria pointed a giant finger on the GOP in his particular, The Divided States of America: What Is Tearing Us Aside? Again and again, the reply was boiled right down to Republicans. And if that wasn’t sufficient, Republicans have been generally described as racists.
Zakaria mentioned, “When students hung out with Tea Get together activists, they discovered that behind the speak of taxes and massive authorities have been folks principally motivated by fears about race and immigration.”
He moved on to how Ailes “turned his channel right into a right-wing bull horn, blurring details and opinion like by no means earlier than.”
He added, “Trump had a job mannequin for his exploitation of the category divide: Sarah Palin, who did it first.”
His remaining goal was Gingrich: “Earlier than there was a Donald Trump, there was a Republican pioneer who paved the best way for the Trump model of harmful politics. … His legacy has been each darkish and far-reaching — a everlasting state of struggle between the events.”
Some excerpts from CNN’s The Divided States of America: What’s Tearing Us Aside? which aired Sunday night time, Jan. 31:
FAREED ZAKARIA: When students hung out with Tea Get together activists, they discovered behind the speak of taxes and massive authorities have been folks principally motivated by fears about race and immigration.
JON MEACHAM: The individuals who have been most radicalized by the Trump years believed that range was an concept, not a vivid actuality.
ZAKARIA: In 1950, the 12 months our political events have been mentioned to be too comparable, the nation was about 90% white. Now in 2021, as we face an existential disaster of political division, America is about 59% white.
MEACHAM: We live in probably the most vivid manifestation of the politics of concern in our historical past. That’s the place we at the moment are.
…
ZAKARIA: Ailes grew to become the go-to right-wing media strategist of the Nineteen Eighties, notorious for his vicious assaults.
TV AD NARRATOR: As Gov. Michael Dukakis gave weekend furloughs to first-degree murderers.
ZAKARIA: In 1996, Ailes discovered his future when billionaire Rupert Murdoch got here calling. The suitable wing’s favourite hatchet man was now creating a brand new information community. The previous, mainstream media cartel had splintered.
BRIT HUME, IN OLD FNC PROMO: As of late, folks suppose TV information is about as unbiased because the commercials.
ZAKARIA: On cable, each channel wanted to seek out its personal slice of the viewers. Ailes turned his channel right into a right-wing bull horn, blurring details and opinion like by no means earlier than. Huge scores and earnings quickly adopted.
…
ZAKARIA: Donald Trump had a job mannequin for his exploitation of the category divide: Sarah Palin, who did it first. When America’s hockey mother grew to become John McCain’s operating mate in 2008 —
SARAH PALIN, FORMER REPUBLICAN ALASKA GOVERNOR: They are saying the distinction between a hockey mother and a pit bull: lipstick.
ZAKARIA: She leaned closely on id politics, on American values and tradition, to rile up her base.
PALIN: I’m not a member of the everlasting political institution.
ZAKARIA: Her model of America, speaking about the true America, saying, ‘I’m one among you,’ was the precursor of Trump’s struggle on elites.
GEORGE PACKER: Sarah Palin, who I consider as John the Baptist to Trump, she was the one who got here first.
DONALD TRUMP: Governor Sarah Palin.
…
ZAKARIA: However earlier than there was a Donald Trump, there was a Republican pioneer who paved the best way for the Trump model of harmful politics.
NEWT GINGRICH, FORMER REPUBLICAN HOUSE SPEAKER: I’m a real revolutionary. They’re the real reactionaries. We’re going to change their world.
ZAKARIA: That is the story of Newt Gingrich, the person who wrote the playbook for the fashionable conservative motion. … It was a really totally different time in politics when civility and compromise mattered. Home Republican Chief Bob Michael was broadly often called Mr. Good Man. Think about that.
VAN JONES: Newt Gingrich is available in with a buzz noticed.
GINGRICH: What we live by way of is a elementary civil wrestle, a civil struggle fought in public speeches reasonably than with armies.
ZAKARIA: The Gingrich philosophy: The one approach for Republicans to win again energy was to be nasty — actually nasty.
GINGRICH: For the Democrats to principally say not solely are we going to rape you however it’s important to pay for the resort room is a bit a lot.
ZAKARIA: To deal with Democrats not as opponents however the enemy. … His legacy has been each darkish and far-reaching — a everlasting state of struggle between the events.
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Fairly a pretentious feat by CNN and Zakaria in managing responsible the entire nation’s ills on the tone of the rhetoric from conservative political figures, as if liberals are innocent for political divisiveness. By selecting responsible just one facet, CNN and Zakaria are exacerbating the very drawback they declare to be attempting to diagnose.”
Ranking: 5 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ January 25: Liberal Media Scream: Nuremberg trial for Trump?
(Washington Examiner put up)
You’ll suppose they might be completely happy to maneuver on, however this week’s Liberal Media Scream options an ABC Information analyst calling for the second impeachment trial within the Senate of former President Donald Trump to be extra of a reality and accountability fee course of.
“To me, the impeachment — we now have to separate the components of the impeachment vote. I imply, different international locations have gone by way of this earlier than, Germany, Japan, South Africa, and the factor earlier than you get to reconciliation and therapeutic, it’s important to have some component of reality and accountability on this,” mentioned Matthew Dowd.
What occurred in these international locations? South Africa arrange the Fact and Reconciliation Fee after the top of apartheid, Japan had the Tokyo Conflict Crimes Tribunal after World Conflict II, and Germany had the Nuremberg trials.
In calling for a Trump reality tribunal, Dowd urged that with out one, america could possibly be in for a century of political hassle that he in comparison with racism.
Dowd through the roundtable on Sunday’s This Week on ABC:
“Effectively, to me, the impeachment — we now have to separate the components of the impeachment vote. I imply, different international locations have gone by way of this earlier than, Germany, Japan, South Africa, and the factor earlier than you get to reconciliation and therapeutic, it’s important to have some component of reality and accountability on this.
“And even apart from these international nation examples, we now have an instance in our nation throughout Reconstruction within the aftermath of the Civil Conflict once we went by way of — we have been alleged to undergo a strategy of reality and accountability and altering the character of what went on. And when Abraham Lincoln was killed and Andrew Johnson took over, reconciling — I imply, the thought of forming a factor and demanding reality was stopped. And what did they lead to, George? It resulted on this nation of Jim Crow legal guidelines, it resulted on this nation of the KKK, and it resulted on this nation of 100 years extra of a struggle for justice and reality and equality in our nation.
“And so, we now have to get to a scenario the place, sure, let’s have a dialogue of what was the reality, what did Donald Trump do, what ought to be his accountability, and the ultimate stage of that’s: What ought to be his punishment?
“And to me, the one approach to do this is to have a dialog within the trial within the Senate the place details and information and knowledge and data is offered in such a approach that the American public can see precisely what went on, what was Donald Trump accountable for, what ought to he held accountable to. After which, finally, what ought to his punishment be?
“However we should always not do what occurred in Reconstruction. When Reconstruction was ended and we went by way of this big, lengthy, centurylong course of when justice lastly prevailed ultimately. Now we have to have an perception into the reality earlier than we get to reconciliation and therapeutic.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “To say something Donald Trump has achieved is on par with genocidal regimes, or that he has left the nation in a situation anyplace much like a segregated, race-based two-class system just like the America within the a long time after the Civil Conflict, is simply ridiculous. The opposite panelists ought to have laughed at him. Dowd wants his personal accountability session to separate actuality from his overwrought historic comparisons.”
Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ January 18, 2021: Liberal Media Scream: Name to silence conservatives and kick OANN and Newsmax off air
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN offering a platform for a name to take rivals OANN and Newsmax off the air and to additionally rob conservative influencers of social media retailers.
On the heels of Huge Tech kicking the conservative chat web site Parler and firearms web site AR15.com offline, the previous head of safety for Fb and Yahoo mentioned taking platforms away from conservatives is the results of the election and protests on the U.S. Capitol.
Alex Stamos mentioned, we “have to show down the aptitude of those conservative influencers to succeed in these big audiences” on Fb and YouTube.
“Then we’re going to have to determine the OANN and Newsmax drawback,” urging they be faraway from cable techniques. “These corporations have freedom of speech, however I’m unsure we’d like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, and such to be bringing them into tens of hundreds of thousands of houses.”
Stamos, on Sunday’s Dependable Sources, the place he appeared with Krebs Stamos Group companion Christopher Krebs, the Trump administration’s former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company:
“First, it’s important to give attention to the violent extremists, and people corporations need to be courageous in that approach. And, second, we now have to show down the aptitude of those conservative influencers to succeed in these big audiences. There are folks on YouTube, for instance, which have a bigger daytime — bigger viewers than daytime CNN, and they’re extraordinarily radical and pushing extraordinarily radical views.”
“And, so, it’s as much as the Facebooks and YouTubes, particularly, to consider whether or not or not they wish to be successfully cable networks for disinformation. After which we’re going to have to determine the OANN and Newsmax drawback, you realize, these corporations have freedom of speech, however I’m unsure we’d like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, and such to be bringing them into tens of hundreds of thousands of houses. That is, you realize, permitting folks to hunt out info in the event that they actually wish to, however not pushing it into their faces, I believe is the place we’re going to need to go right here.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “A really stable sign Huge Tech’s agenda goes past what they wish to painting as benign efforts to close down these advocating violence. Stamos laid out the following step: Use present issues to justify a wider suppression of conservative voices who’ve allowed area for views these on the Left discover appalling. The reply is extra free speech, not letting a small group of rich Silicon Valley tech leaders abuse their energy to function ‘speech police,’ deciding which views are OK or not with the elite in the mean time.”
Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ January 11, 2021: Liberal Media Scream: CNN needs conservative media squelched in ‘nationwide emergency’
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN’s senior media reporter demanding the focusing on of conservative media retailers who ignored their anti-Trump bias in reporting on the president and his administration.
On Sunday’s Dependable Sources, Oliver Darcy demanded conservative information sources be “held accountable,” clearly suggesting that they have to be squelched, an enlargement of the so-called “cancel tradition” imposed with glee by retailers comparable to Twitter and Fb on conservatives and even President Trump.
He cited Fox Information and “TV suppliers that beam OAN and Newsmax into houses, or Rush Limbaugh. There are lots of people profiting off of lies and conspiracy theories.”
He insisted, “this informational surroundings” have to be “cleaned up.”
Darcy, on the finish of Sunday’s Dependable Sources:
“The story this week was bringing our informational disaster to the forefront. It’s a nationwide emergency. You’ve firms and other people which can be profiting off lies and conspiracy theories, whether or not that’s large tech, whether or not that’s Fox Information, whether or not that’s TV suppliers that beam OAN and Newsmax into houses, or Rush Limbaugh. There are lots of people profiting off of lies and conspiracy theories, and I don’t actually see how issues get higher, how we transfer on as a rustic till this informational surroundings is cleaned up.”
After host Brian Stelter complained that “Fox Information, the Murdochs, they’re nonetheless enabling these items as a result of they’re obsessing over large tech bias, that’s what they name it, and attempting to disregard the riot,” Darcy demanded:
“The place are they? They should be held accountable as properly. We have been speaking lots about folks like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz. Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch, they should be held accountable for the lies that they’ve peddled to this nation, not solely up to now two months concerning the election both, however up to now, you realize, a number of years which have actually introduced this to the forefront.”
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Darcy revealed the true agenda the onerous left inside CNN: Selectively cite the baseless allegations of some on one facet of the political spectrum to justify shutting down all the most important retailers which permit conservative views to get an airing, silencing these with which Darcy disagrees, thus permitting the general public to solely hear left wing views. An ideal instance of ‘cancel tradition.’”
Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.
■ January 4, 2021: Liberal Media Scream: Smug Chuck Todd to senator, ‘I’ve Had Sufficient of Listening to This!’
(Washington Examiner put up)
This week’s Liberal Media Scream options NBC’s Chuck Todd, who placed on his most dismissive smirk Sunday to mock Republican Sen. Ron Johnson’s protection of President Trump’s claims of election fraud.
It got here on Todd’s present, Meet the Press, and regardless of speaking over Johnson, a matter-of-fact lawmaker/businessman, the senator stood his floor and advised the host after being badgered, “You’ve destroyed the credibility of the information media by your bias.”
When Johnson identified, “This hearth was began once you utterly ignored, for instance, our investigation of Hunter Biden,” Todd jumped in: “Senator. All proper, I’ve had sufficient of listening to this!”
In the course of the heated, multi-minute change, Todd turned to ridicule when Johnson mentioned investigating Trump’s allegations of voter fraud. “Why didn’t you maintain hearings concerning the 9/11 truthers? There’s loads of individuals who thought 9/11 was an inside job.” And: “How concerning the Moon touchdown? Are you going to carry hearings on that?”
From the Sunday, Jan. 3, Meet the Press:
SEN. RON JOHNSON: Chuck, this fireplace was began again in, you realize, January of 2017. Individuals like Mark Zaid in his tweet, ‘The coup has began. First of many steps. Rise up and impeachment to comply with finally.’ This was began when the mainstream media stopped, dropped any pretense of being unbiased and really selected sides throughout this election. This hearth was began once you utterly ignored, for instance, our investigation of Hunter Biden. You understand, no proof of wrongdoing there. And now we discover out after the election, no, there’s a honest quantity of proof to the purpose that we now have an actual FBI investigation. So-
CHUCK TODD: Senator. All proper, I’ve had sufficient of listening to this!
JOHNSON: No, pay attention. I’ve had sufficient of this, too. It’s the bias of the media.
TODD: No, senator. It’s, you’ve got spent, you’ve got spent the final two years —
JOHNSON: It’s the bias within the media that has created a scenario the place Republicans and conservatives don’t belief the mainstream media. And that’s what, that’s what has destroyed the credibility of the media and our establishments and actually —
TODD: Proper, no, the destruction of the establishments —
JOHNSON: — shaken confidence on this election outcome. So I didn’t begin this … I didn’t, I didn’t mild this fireplace. This hearth was lit over 4 years in the past. And we’ve destroyed the credibility, you’ve got destroyed the credibility of the information media by your bias. And naturally folks like James Comey, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan destroyed the credibility of the FBI and our justice system as properly. Now we have an unlimited drawback on this nation. It’s unsustainable. And the one approach you remedy it’s with info, and transparency, and hearings, and investigations. It’s not quackery, it’s not conspiracy principle. It’s what’s going to be required.
TODD: Let me ask you this. Then why didn’t you maintain hearings concerning the 9/11 truthers? There’s loads of individuals who thought 9/11 was an inside job. So that you’re principally saying is that if there’s sufficient individuals who consider a conspiracy principle, if there’s sufficient individuals who maintain, how concerning the Moon touchdown? Are you going to carry hearings on that?
JOHNSON: There are every kind of issues that I’d like to carry hearings on. It’s a must to type of decide and select based mostly on priorities. Proper now, we now have this election. We’ve bought tens of hundreds of thousands of Individuals that suppose this election was stolen. We have to get the underside of it. Once more, what’s defined, we have to clarify it, get that off the desk. We additionally need to acknowledge there have been some actual issues right here. There’s some points that should be explored and investigated.
TODD: You’ve bought to ask your self once you inform folks 1,000,000 occasions that one thing was stolen or one thing was fraud after which they consider it, I believe you have to look within the mirror and ask your self why so many individuals believed it.
JOHNSON: Effectively, Chuck, you have to take a look at your mirror since you carried the Democrats’ water on the entire Russian collusion with the Trump marketing campaign hoax —
TODD: Sen. Johnson, I’ve bought to go. I respect you approaching. I’ve allow you to, I’ve allow you to say loads of —
JOHNSON: That’s what you probably did within the media. You carried that water for years. You destroyed the credibility of the press, not me.
TODD: Sen. Johnson, apart from, apart from crediting you for approaching, I respect that as a result of solely two of your colleagues had the center to say sure this weekend about this conspiracy principle that you simply’re engaged on.
Media Analysis Middle Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly decide: “Todd couldn’t have been extra smug and sanctimonious towards a visitor as he used his platform to discredit and mock a U.S. senator with whom he disagrees. Fairly an egregious abuse of Todd’s journalistic position, particularly because it’s very onerous to think about him ever displaying such disdain towards a liberal visitor, and yet another instance of why Trump supporters don’t belief the ‘mainstream media.’”
Ranking: 5 out of 5 SCREAMS.
> Liberal Media Scream posts for 2020.
> For all of 2019.
> For all of 2018.
> For July by way of December 2017.
> For January by way of June 2017.
> For July by way of December 2016.
> For January by way of June 2016.
> For July to December 2015.